Apocalyptic forecasts increase as climate change conference draws near

Despite recent terrorist attacks, Paris is expecting the convergence of 40,000 delegates, journalists, and non-governmental organizations at the next United Nations’ climate change conference to be held November 30-December 11, 2015.
This is the BIG ONE under the United Framework Convention of Climate Change UNFCCC Conference of the Parties COP 21.  The global warming alarmists expect this conference to produce a legally binding document making industrialized countries eliminate fossil fuels from their energy and pay reparations to developing countries for damages caused by climate change.
They want to create a carbon neutral society.  Of course, this is not possible since every human produces CO2 with every breath.  CO2 is the breath of life.
The apocalyptic forecast is humans produce too much CO2 in the atmosphere from over consumptive lifestyles which is in turn produces global warming.  And, according to the alarmists, Earth must not be allowed to warm more than 2 degrees Celsius or all living things will die.
COP 16 held in Copenhagen, Denmark in 2009 was supposed to be the conference putting all of this into play, especially since Barack Hussein Obama had just been elected, but the conference was a bust.  It was a draw between the U.S. and China.  So the UNFCCC had to begin a new propaganda program to convince the world of the looming global warming crisis finally culminating in COP 21. 
There have been two persistent problems.  First, the world has been experiencing worldwide recession and people are much more concerned with paying bills than global warming.  Second, the planet is no longer getting warmer.  According to satellite readings (one of the most accurate ways to determine global temperatures), Earth has had no significant warming since 1998.
Climate change alarmism never stops and has increased over the last six months as COP21 draws near.  Endless newspaper articles tell us this is the hottest year or month on record.  Every weather extreme, even those days with the coldest recorded temperatures, are blamed on global warming. 
Bill Gates and Pope Francis tell us capitalism is the reason for climate change.  There is even a new mental disorder brought about by the crisis called “climate advocacy trauma.”
If all of this isn’t enough to insult our intelligence, President Obama tells us climate change “constitutes a serious threat to global security” and “it will impact how the military defends our country.”  Never mind the threat of ISIS.  Secretary of State, John Kerry says climate change carries the same global threat as the “proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.”  It’s really unsettling to think these men are the leaders of the most powerful country in the world.
Dr. Richard Lindzen, a world renowned meteorologist who received his PhD. from Harvard; was reviewer and contributing author for the first and second Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change IPCC Scientific Assessments and lead author on the third assessment, but does not believe in anthropogenic (human-induced) global warming, says that most scientists whether skeptic or believer agree that global warming will not create a catastrophic event.  He says the “catastrophic narrative” is due totally to the politicians and the environmentalists.
He cited Mike Hulme, Director of Tyndall Center at the University of East Anglia and a strong global warming advocate saying, “To state that climate change will be ‘catastrophic’ hides a cascade of value-laden assumptions which do not emerge from empirical or theoretical science.”
Advocate, Gavin Schmidt, Jim Hansen’s successor as head of NASA’s Goddard Institute of Space Studies says about extreme weather, “General statements about extremes are almost nowhere to be found in the literature but….abound in the popular media….if anyone thinks about that for 10 seconds they realize that’s nonsense.”
The argument for climate change is also lost in the fact that CO2 emissions are on the rise while at the same time global temperatures remain stable proving there is no cause and effect.  The increase of CO2 does not cause global warming.
The UNFCCC has created a financial atonement for attendees feeling guilty about leaving a large carbon footprint traveling to Paris.   They simply need to log into
a website called Climate Neutral and make a purchase of carbon credits.
Once logged in, travel can be calculated.  Traveling coach creates less CO2 emissions than traveling business class.  Flying coach from DFW to Paris creates 1065.75 Kg of CO2 and flying Business creates 2131.51 Kg of CO2.  Once the CO2 emissions are known, a project can be selected like a wind or solar project which is supposedly being built in a third world country.  These projects cost anywhere from $1.00-$4.00 a Tonne.  Selecting 900 Tonnes at $1.95 for a wind project costs  $1755.00 plus a 19% tax of $333.45 with a grand total of $2088.45.
There are disclaimers attached to this website stating the UNFCCC is not responsible is a project is not completed.  If a delegate purchases a carbon credit, they will be given a free booklet at the conference on other projects.
As I travel to Paris, my conscience will be completely clear and of course, Obama will feel no guilt as he flies Air Force One to COP21.
If  COP 21 is successful, it will give Obama the final tools to transform America into a third world economy.
Categories

About the Author: Pat Carlson

Pat Carlson

72 Comments
  1. Brin Jenkins

    In the 1971 I had a short dalliance with a rather sexy miss, who initiated into the Green Peace organisation. I had interest in energy conservation and recovery, so perhaps I was a greenie in those Hippy days although I also ran my own business.

    Transport was discussed, and I spoke of my interest in Airships, I just loved them and still do. I envisaged a giant saucer that never landed, where goods and passengers might be loaded and disembarked by docking ferries in mid air. Really not a practical proposition but I was still encouraged to make drawings and arrange a presentation of this crazy scheme with a solar powered turbine propulsion unit. With my slide rule and research I soon dismissed the idea and dropped it.

    I think many greenies are still in that place today, but unable to ditch their daft ideas.

      • CB

        “in the early 70’s we were going into an ice age?? n.est pas”

        N’est-ce pas, indeed!

        This is one of many dishonest Climate Denier talking points intentionally crafted by the fossil fuel industry to mislead people about the dangerous nature of their product.

        Is it possible there are people out there who still don’t know this by now?

        “There was no scientific consensus in the 1970s that the Earth was headed into an imminent ice age. Indeed, the possibility of anthropogenic warming dominated the peer-reviewed literature even then.”

        journals.ametsoc.org/doi/pdf/10.1175/2008BAMS2370.1

        “CFACT has received over $4.1 million in funds from Donor’s Trust and Donor’s Capital Fund between 2002-2011, plus an additional $582,000 from ExxonMobil between 1998-2012”

        http://www.desmogblog.com/committee-constructive-tomorrow

          • CB

            “Big al made how much and lives what size carbon mansion??”

            I don’t even know what you’re talking about!

            That’s how disconnected from reality you are…

            Why don’t you address the issue instead of describing your favourite cartoon:

            Are humans warming the planet, John?

            What do you think?

            “Multiple studies published in peer-reviewed scientific journals show that 97 percent or more of actively publishing climate scientists agree: Climate-warming trends over the past century are very likely due to human activities.”

            climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus

  2. Dano2

    The increase of CO2 does not cause global warming.

    Hilarious. Earth has a NewPhysics, something extraordinary that happens only on earth and nowhere else in the universe, everybody!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11

    Best,

    D

    • Otter

      Yes, there has been a new physics for some 30 years now. It backs the theory of ‘man-made’ global warming, which is somehow all catastrophic, all the time.

        • Brin Jenkins

          Really? Why not explain your understanding in your own words. Otherwise why should anyone believe a guy that’s unable to explain his own fervent belief? If you are unable to, then perhaps it’s just all made up on the hoof. If you can show me the mechanism for CO2 heating, perhaps that list of scientists might also be swayed. Silly comments like “drink” are unimpressive as is the haha diarrhea, What garbage is lolized supposed to mean? That’s not even funny, just pathetic floundering in ignorance.

            • Brin Jenkins

              A number of folk differ from your point which you persist is correct. Humor me and please re-present your explanation. You’re missing an opportunity to demonstrate your scientific understanding.

              I think you show by your reticence you are unable to.

              • Dano2

                A number of folk differ from your point

                None of these folk have any education, so it doesn’t matter what they think.

                CO2 is a greenhouse gas that absorbs and reradiates long-wave radiation, when radiated downward it results in warming the planet. Without GHGs the planet would be ~33C colder. This effect was discovered in the 1850s and a Nobel was awarded for work done in 1896 to calculate how much warming would result from a doubling of CO2, so mankind has known about the greenhouse effect for well over a century – denying it is inane.

                I’ve bookmarked this comment so when you play this game again I’ll just refer back to this link.

                Best,

                D

                • Brin Jenkins

                  Ah got it now, you are the Climate Messiah who knows, but is unable to explain!.

                  You have never explained, and have no explanation or you would do so now.

                  Is there any wonder folk have so little regard for your Bolshevik views?

    • david russell

      Additional CO2 has a warming effect, just not much of one. During the almost 2 most recent decades of your above chart humans increased CO2 emissions by 50 percent with effectively no warming AT ALL.

    • JOHNBOY11

      If it gets warmer our furnacas won,t run as much//reducing our output of your scary carbon. Think we could grow pineapples in ct

  3. Mervyn

    Never before have so many lies been told – about an alleged problem relating to a false theory – by so many deceitful people including an American president, in order to drive a political agenda based on an abuse of science to achieve their ideological goal.

  4. calhou

    The only apocalypse will be the one manufactured by the statists and foisted on the public in order to accomplish through fear and lies, what cannot be accomplished through freedom and logic. The third world wants the US to give them money……and lots of it. Obama is happy to roll over. Yet the national debt is at $19 Trillion…….headed to $20 trillion…….where the hell are we supposed to come up with it?

0 Pings & Trackbacks