It’s climate regulations that threaten us

Here are some climate actions President Trump could take to Make America Great Again

wolfscottIn President-Elect Donald Trump’s Contract with the American Voter, a “100-day action plan to Make America Great Again,” Mr. Trump outlines several measures he says he will undertake to create jobs and spur economic growth.

While much of his proposed agenda will help to improve the economy while also leaving reasonable environmental protections in place, I believe there are two additional environment-related policy changes that he could take to jump-start the economy.

In a September 21, 2015, appearance on Hugh Hewitt’s radio dtsmileshow, Mr. Trump said, “I’m not a believer in manmade global warming. I mean, Obama thinks it’s the No. 1 problem in the world today. I think it’s very low on the list.… We have much bigger problems.”

If these comments accurately reflect Trump’s views, a first important step he could take to undo the damage done by the Obama Administration’s vainglorious attempt to control climate and weather would be to reverse the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) determination that carbon dioxide (CO2) is a pollutant endangering public and environmental health.

This “endangerment finding” came about in response to the EPA following a narrow 5-4 Supreme Court decision in the 2007 case Massachusetts v. EPA. In that case, a majority of the justices ruled that, if the EPA determines CO2 emissions are causing global warming – and global warming may reasonably be expected to endanger public health or welfare – then it has the authority to regulate CO2 as a pollutant.

In fact, the justices ruled, the EPA would be required to regulate CO2 under such a finding, unless it can provide a reasonable basis for not choosing to regulate this vitally important, plant-fertilizing gas.

stupidcarRelying on unsubstantiated projections produced by the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the EPA did determine that CO2 emissions from cars and industry do threaten human welfare. That led directly to the agency’s decision to limit those emissions.

For instance, the endangerment finding was the basis for ratcheting up automobile fuel-economy standards to 54.5 mpg by 2025. That could soon mean consumers no longer have the right or ability to choose the vehicles they drive – based on safety, passenger, or cargo considerations, for example – by either forcing all but the smallest cars off the roads or, at the very least, making larger cars and trucks too expensive for all but the relatively wealthy to drive.

Additionally, the endangerment finding serves as the foundation forclowncar various Obama Administration regulations requiring utilities, oil and gas producers, and other entities to cut their greenhouse gas emissions. If these draconian rules are not overturned by the Trump Administration, Americans will pay much more for energy and their energy supplies will be less reliable.

Mr. Trump cannot undo the endangerment finding with the stroke of a pen. To reverse it, he must instead charge the EPA to demonstrate, through independent, validated research, that CO2 emissions are “toxic” (which they are not at any levels that might occur in Earth’s atmosphere) – or that global warming is causing measurable amounts of sea-level rise, increased hurricane numbers or intensity, the spread of diseases, or other harms directly attributable to CO2 emissions in the United States.

If the EPA cannot directly link such problems to U.S. CO2 emissions – and it can’t – or cannot show such problems can be dramatically reduced by cutting U.S. CO2 emissions – and again it can’t – then the EPA should withdraw the endangerment finding.

Withdrawing the endangerment finding would end the legal justification for a range of burdensome climate regulations. In the process, it would also end radical environmental activists’ ability to use courts to impose climate policies on an unwilling public whose elected representatives have repeatedly rejected climate policies.

parisclimateSecond, President-Elect Trump also recognizes that, to fully reverse Barack Obama’s harmful climate policies, the United States must withdraw from international climate agreements that drive and justify many domestic climate actions – and must stop diverting billions of dollars of taxpayer money from important domestic and defense concerns to UN climate programs.

In his Contract with the American Voter, Mr. Trump pledges to “cancel billions in payments to UN climate change programs, and use the money to fix America’s water and environmental infrastructure.”

Trump can accomplish this unilaterally by halting the Obama Administration’s illegal shift of State Department funds – funds that Congress directed would be used in other diplomatic programs, such as combating virulent diseases – to the United Nations’ Green Climate Fund.

The easiest way for President Trump to end the United States’ bush41participation in all international climate agreements would be for him, on day one, to remove America’s signature from the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), signed by President George H.W. Bush in 1992.

Article 25 of the UNFCCC allows any state party to that convention to withdraw upon giving 1 year’s notice, without incurring any further obligation.

In fact, withdrawing from the UNFCCC would cancel United States obligations to all other UN-brokered climate agreements subsequent to it, including the Paris “agreement” that President Obama signed, because all subsequent agreements were built upon the UNFCCC.

Our nation is not threatened by manmade climate change. It is threatened by regulations implemented in the name of protecting us from dangerous manmade climate and weather.

These two actions would be a great first step toward “putting America first” during President Trump’s first 100 days in office.

Categories

About the Author: H Sterling Burnett, Ph.D.

H. Sterling Burnett, Ph.D., is one of the country's leading authorities on energy and environmental issues. Formerly with the National Center for Policy Analysis, Burnett is currently a Heartland Institute research fellow on environmental policy and managing editor of Environment & Climate News. He is also a CFACT advisor.

  • November 15, 2016 Climate Report to UN: Trump right, UN wrong

    Skeptics Deliver Consensus Busting ‘State of the Climate Report’ to UN Summit Climate Depot’s 44 Page Report Presented To UN Climate Summit in Marraketch, Morocco – Trump is correct to be skeptical of ‘climate change’ claims

    http://www.climatedepot.com/2016/11/15/skeptics-deliver-2016-state-of-the-climate-report-to-un-summit-everything-you-been-told-about-global-warming-is-wrong/

    • Dano2

      Swift Boat Propagandist! drink!

      Best,

      D

      • Immortal600

        Dano the child speaks!

        • Brin Jenkins

          Speak suggests intelligence. Where was it?

  • Dano2

    It’s climate regulations that threaten us

    “Us” meaning fossil fools of course. Everyone else benefits.

    Best.

    D

    • Immortal600

      Still trolling, child?

      • Dano2

        Here’s a hankie. There, there.

        Best,

        D

        • Immortal600

          You are such a child. You got schooled on another post by Tom Austin. You are a fool.

          • Dano2

            “another”

            Best,

            D

            • Immortal600

              That’s right, child.

              • Dano2

                “right”

                Best,

                D

                • Immortal600

                  Best D the kook.

                  hahahahahahahahahahaha

          • Otter

            There has to be a way to block this idiot.

            • Immortal600

              Flag all his comments and maybe the mods will ban him. Me? I like toying with the clown. He is totally ignorant and nowhere near as smart as he likes to claim. His childish statements give him away.

              • Dano2

                Indeed – like your previous screen name got banned here.

                Well, not exactly “like”, as your previous screen name was banned for unhinged ad hom, just like this current screen name.

                Best,

                D

                • Immortal600

                  Dummy. My screen name did not get banned. Only in your warped little mind did it happen, child.

            • Dano2

              There is. The block feature is in the down triangle at the upper right of the comment when moused over.

              Best,

              D

    • Brin Jenkins

      Mumbling nonsense again with no explanation as per normal for danobest

    • Brin Jenkins

      Do explain how poverty helps folk?