Trump orders roll back of EPA’s WOTUS rule

President Donald Trump signed an executive order targeting a major Obama-era policy expanding federal authority over bodies of water.

“Let’s start hiring those people, fellas,” Trump said before signing the order while surrounded by federal lawmakers and county officials.

Trump ordered federal agencies to make sure “waters are kept free from pollution, while at the same time promoting economic growth, minimizing regulatory uncertainty” and respecting the role of states and Congress.

Trump also ordered agencies to define “navigable waters” in a “manner consistent with the opinion of Justice Antonin Scalia in Rapanos v. United States” — a more narrow interpretation of federal Clean Water Act authority.

Repealing parts of “Waters of the U.S.” (WOTUS) could take months or even years since the rule will have to go through the public comment period. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, which jointly administer WOTUS, will have to justify their findings with scientific research.

“And if the Trump Administration rescinds the existing WOTUS and promulgates a replacement, that action will be subject to a challenge in the courts,” Thaddeus Lightfoot, a partner at the law firm Dorsey & Whitney, said in an emailed statement.

A federal court blocked WOTUS in 2015 after 32 states sued to have the rule overturned. Lightfoot said Trump could use Congress to fully block WOTUS if the courts lift the stay on the rule.

“For example, if the courts lift the WOTUS rule stay or uphold the rule, the administration’s budget for EPA and the Corps could propose to withhold funds for implementation,” Lightfoot said.

But Trump may get help from Congress.

Ohio Republican Rep. Bob Gibbs introduced a bill Monday to repeal WOTUS using the Congressional Review Act (CRA).

Using the CRA to repeal WOTUS would also prevent a federal agency from issuing a similar rule in the future. What’s unclear, however, is how Gibbs will justify his CRA given their are limits to what can be repealed.

EPA and the Corps finalized WOTUS in 2015, arguing it was necessary to clear up jurisdictional confusion in the wake of two U.S. Supreme Court cases.

Thirty-two states filed suit against EPA and the Corps to get federal judges to strike down the rule. EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt sued to have the rule overturned while attorney general of Oklahoma. A federal judge in North Dakota issued a stay against WOTUS in August 2015.

Republicans pointed to big problems with how WOTUS was crafted.

Utah Rep. Jason Chaffetz, the chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, issued a report that found high-level White House staffers “assured environmentalist groups the Administration would quickly finalize the WOTUS rule.”

That “caused the career staff involved in developing the rule to feel pressure to meet accelerated timelines, which caused deficiencies in the regulatory process,” according to Chaffetz’s report.

The Government Accountability Office found last year that EPA had violated federal anti-lobbying rules by conducting a massive social media campaign with environmentalists to promote WOTUS.

This article originally appeared in The Daily Caller

Categories

About the Author: Michael Bastasch

Michael Bastasch writes on energy, climate and the environment for the Daily Caller.

  • Immortal600

    Finally! Some sanity!

  • J T

    By GOD, Dano, how do you live with yourself? Poor baby!

    • wally12

      @J T: Great comment J T. You beat Dano to the punch. I wish I had thought of that.

    • wally12

      @J T: great post. You beat Dano to the punch. I wish I would have done that.

  • wally12

    I find that to repeal something that the EPA or any other agency does is so complex and time consuming. I was always assumed that the Congress and the president had the power to abolish any rule or law with agreement of the legislature and the president. Is it true that agencies who have been given the power to enact regulations have more power than the legislators and the president? What is the real rule?

  • Dano2

    The swamp is going to drain on Trumpkins first. I know I should feel sorry for them, but I just can’t. Their children I will pity, however.

    Best,

    D

    • Brin Jenkins

      The Stupid is strong is this one, ignore him we should.

  • FlexoRick

    Stay the course, Trump is trumping the media and I love it.
    We finally have a man in the WH who does what he says he will do.