Model mayhem and the folly of false acceptance
Computer models get a weather reality check.
Computer models get a weather reality check.
The only climate model that agrees with observations says there is NO climate emergency. Meanwhile half of the IPCC models are getting hotter than ever before.
Computer models are useful tools, but once reality disproves them, they must be adjusted or discarded. Dr. Patrick Moore is more than capable of explaining. That's why the Left wants him stopped. TAKE ACTION NOW!
Newly published data gathered by NASA’s AIRS satellite confirm the Earth is warming more slowly than has been forecast by climate activists and the UN IPCC, even with an El Niñoto help them out.
Aren't we entitled to a reality check before we turn over control of our economy to the Left to redistribute our wealth?
The predicted deluge of journal articles touting 1.5 degrees of global warming as the new UN target has begun.
Don't confuse speculative conclusions drawn about climate science with the science itself.
The question is what difference does this tiny difference make as far as future global impacts go?
Do the fundamental assumptions about CO2 in the climate models hold up?
Over-reliance on computer simulations is a major problem in climate science. If those models are based on data that has been adjusted for political reason the problem worsens.
Something like 55% of the modeling done in all of science is done in climate change science, even though it is a tiny fraction of the whole of science.
The alarmist science community lives on studies that claim to find that "It's worse than we thought" and two beauties have just come out. It is all just computer games but the green press loves it.
Long-term climate simulations have never come close to being accurate.
Climate models show twice as much warming during the 21st Century than what’s actually been observed, according to a new report highlighting the limitations of global climate models