CFACT EXCLUSIVE: Did National Weather Service Director Louis Uccellini push and threaten a 40 year veteran meteorologist? “An incredibly well-oiled propaganda machine.” Data manipulation and a culture of fear.
If Lewis and Curry are right, and the warming effect of CO2 is only 50–70% of what the “consensus” has said, cuts in CO2 emissions need not be as drastic as previously thought.
Many research results published in scientific journals shouldn’t be trusted.
Exempting China and India from abiding to the non-binding deal is one of the main reasons why greenhouse gas emission are pitching upward, Environmental rules in the U.S. are causing companies to shift production to countries not tethered to the accord’s strict provisions.
It’s the latest in a slew of studies trying to figure out how much warming can be expected from a doubling of carbon dioxide levels. The answer: not much, according to Lewis and Curry.
The standard definition of a hoax is a deliberate deception that is intended to fool a lot of people.
Boulderites want the courts to force ExxonMobil and Suncor to pay treble damages for causing too much snow and thus floods in some years, too little snow and thus droughts and poor ski conditions in other years; multiple heat waves in some years, bitter cold in others.
A look at the facts, however, shows no such thing.
This noted astrophysicist / geoscientist has lost patience with global warming dogma.
The predicted deluge of journal articles touting 1.5 degrees of global warming as the new UN target has begun.
With a torrent of reality leaking into academic journals, can the media hold back the flood?
A major new study says that the cost to meet the UN Paris Agreement’s target of limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees C is a whopping three times the cost to limit it to 2 degrees. That is a huge cost for a very small difference.
The cities’ suits against oil companies, however, do not show an industry conspiracy to suppress climate science from the public, U.S. District Judge William Alsup said
The question is what difference does this tiny difference make as far as future global impacts go?
Trayon White pushed a theory that the Rothschild family, a European banking dynasty descended from Mayer Amschel Rothschild in the 18th century, were manipulating the weather and responsible for “climate control.”
Watching climate change alarmists fretting about widespread skepticism of their dogma can be amusing if you look at it right.
EPA is what is called an “independent agency, Pruitt can, and may well, go ahead with the Red Team exercise.
State Department bureaucrats hoping to outlast the President, or do an end run around him to keep America in the Paris Climate Accord, just lost a great deal of ground. That’s good news for those of us who care about sound science and constructive energy policies.
“Tillerson was a supporter of (global warming) at ExxonMobil and during his confirmation hearings. On this issue, Pompeo is definitely an upgrade.”
Do the fundamental assumptions about CO2 in the climate models hold up?