Climate confusion from “Popular Science”

Popular Science magazine has a new “news” video and transcript out that truly qualifies as what is now called climate fiction or cli-fi for short.
Popular Science magazine has a new “news” video and transcript out that truly qualifies as what is now called climate fiction or cli-fi for short.
Over-reliance on computer simulations is a major problem in climate science. If those models are based on data that has been adjusted for political reason the problem worsens.
Something like 55% of the modeling done in all of science is done in climate change science, even though it is a tiny fraction of the whole of science.
CFACT Senior Policy Advisor Paul Driessen strongly recommends reading geologist Gregory Wrightstone’s new 123-page book, “Inconvenient Facts: The Science That Al Gore Doesn’t Want You To Know” as a tool for refuting the wild claims of climate alarmists and their minions.
Deliberately discrediting people in order to protect or enhance your business interests sounds illegal to me.
I wondered “How many skeptical videos are there?” and set out to find out.
The international climate machine is about to achieve a new degree of alarmist absurdity, basically speeding up as they hit the wall. It is all about the Paris Climate Agreement targets and it is kind of fun to watch.
John left a lasting legacy in his popular, yet educational, videos debunking climate change alarmism. John is a lot of fun to watch.
From energy and spending, to climate and debate – silencing all dissenting voices is essential.
Call to action! Midnight EST on Wednesday is the deadline for commenting on the wildly alarmist draft National Climate Assessment. As I explained earlier this month here, commenting is pretty easy. Registration is simple and the commenting website works well.
Sandwiches carry with them the same carbon emission output as a car driven 12 miles, according to a study from the University of Manchester.
Now that we have a frigid, snowy winter, it’s not surprising Al Gore is telling us, “bitter cold’ is “exactly what we should expect from the climate crisis.”
Climate scientists hope their mock camp illustrates how global warming could impact the Arctic, but the “Gore effect” may make it harder to get the message across.
James Hansen is falsifying climate alarm right before our eyes.
Everyone at CFACT lost a dear friend with the death of John Coleman.
There are a growing number of books out that explain why people are skeptical of climate change alarmism.
Having agreed that the 2020 CO2 emission cuts promised under the Paris Agreement are not achievable, the might-be German government has tentatively committed to even less realistic promises for 2030.
The basic idea is very simple, which good scams always are. The Federal Government (in other words, taxpayers) buys climate insurance for specific developing countries. This insurance then pays for damages supposedly due to climate change.
The NAACP wants man-made global warming to be seen as a civil rights issue.
A new lesson set called the Climate Change IQ (CCIQ) provides a good skeptical critique of ten top alarmist claims.