Thousands of international bureaucrats, crony capitalists and Green campaigners have
gathered at COP 22, the UN’s annual big climate conference.
This year it’s in Marrakech, Morocco. Thanks to your support CFACT is there!
They came to cash in on the expectations of wealth and power they built after they finally brought the U.S. into the UN climate regime with last year’s Paris climate agreement.
A funny thing happened on day two of the UN conference. The U.S. voted Trump.
Eagle Forum’s Cathie Adams is with CFACT in Morocco. We posted her observations about the “giant shadow” Donald Trump’s victory is casting over the UN conference at CFACT.org. Cathie reports that, “European Union representatives proclaimed that they would not wait for the U.S. to catch up, which begs the question of what we would want to catch up to. Our economy is stronger and our standard of living is higher than most in the EU, so why would Americans prefer the EU’s radical environmental agenda?”
CFACT attended a briefing chaired by HRH Princess Lalla Hasnaa of Morocco. They made clear that spending your tax dollars on climate reeducation 
is a key UN goal. “Indonesia and Uganda” they noted, “have developed national climate change strategies. The Dominican Republic allocated more than $1 million to train teachers on climate change. The Mexican national climate change law includes education as one of its objectives. Non-governmental organizations have been implementing training activities, and youth organizations have raised awareness…
In 2015, the climate change secretariat supported a unique, public consultation on climate change in close to a hundred developed and developing countries. Asked what actions would most likely help combating climate change, More than 77% said education on climate change for the broader public.”
Of course when the UN talks about climate education it means propaganda. The
y want massive funding to place the warming campaign’s talking points relentlessly before the public. That the information they present is riddled with half truths and outright lies doesn’t enter into it.
Yesterday CFACT’s Marc Morano presented a 43 page “State of the Climate” report to the conference that debunks the hype and lays out the real facts. We’re doing our best to keep up with all the media interest. You’ll want to check out this important report for yourself and save it for reference. Be sure to share it with a friend.
Here at the UN climate conference they know the game has changed. They are uncertain how much. CFACT will make sure they find out.
2016 State of the Climate Report
By Marc Morano
Presented to COP 22
UN conference on climate change
November 14, 2016
“CFACT’s Marc Morano presented a 43 page “State of the Climate” report to the conference that debunks the hype and lays out the real facts.”
What rubbish. The report and Rucker’s post have been written to intentionally mislead and misinform. Morano has no scientific credentials whatsoever nor has the “report” received any scientific scrutiny. It’s irrelevant and and simply a repeat of tired and long-debunked arguments.
Ian5 :Another science-denier. Sad, really.
Have you read Morano’s report?
Yes
Have you any credentials Ian?
Yes, I have 2 science degrees and have worked in the natural resource sector for 25 years. But you’ve avoided my point. The point is that Morano has NO scientific credentials whatsoever. None. Nada. He is a paid lobbyist whose job is to mislead and misinform. Look up “Baloney Detection Kit: Carl Sagan’s Rules for BS-Busting and Critical Thinking”. If you still can’t figure it out I can’t help you.
Exactly what do you consider Gore to be? If you’ve 2 science degrees, pray tell, what are they? Science has become a broad ranging term, and having done so, has become skewed. The group you consider to be deniers are either in the fields of science, or have studied the works of those who are. Simply stated, your degrees, provided they exist, are no greater in value than anyone else’s. And neither are your opinions. CO2 was politicked into or onto this so called list of pollutants simply because there’s money in attempting to regulate it. And regulating it is a farce, as it’s produced and reduced, in and by nature itself. Without it, there can be no life. To be rid of it, is to be rid of life. And that, my two degreed non-friend, is absurd. If you actually are a science major, how can you deny what I’ve stated here?