CFACT publishes a monthly climate fact check in concert with allies dedicated to correcting the record on climate.

The latest fact check debunks false narratives on global temperature, Kenyan rain, Antarctic meteorites, coral, atmospheric rivers, Indian floods, and more.

Exaggerations, misleading narratives, and outright lies are “Team Climate’s” stock and trade.  That’s why they put so much effort into working to present one-sided narratives and suppress dissent.

Facts, however, remain powerful things.

CFACT’s friend Joanne Nova reports that “there was a 17% fall in the number of 18 to 34-year-olds who call ‘climate change’ a very serious problem. Even though there were hottest-ever headlines month after month, the punters lost the faith.”

People are opening their eyes and moving beyond climate dogma.

James Freeman reports at the Wall Street Journal that scientific publications may be finally opening their pages to facts that debunk common climate myths,

Ulf Büntgen of the University of Cambridge published in Nature Magazine that:

I see potential conflicts when scholars use information selectively or over-attribute problems to anthropogenic warming, and thus politicise climate and environmental change. Without self-critique and a diversity of viewpoints, scientists will ultimately harm the credibility of their research and possibly cause a wider public, political, and economic backlash…  I find it misleading when prominent organisations, such as the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in its latest summary for policymakers, tend to overstate scientific understanding of the rate of recent anthropogenic warming relative to the range of past natural temperature variability over 2,000 and even 125,000 years. The quality and quantity of available climate proxy records are merely too low to allow for a robust comparison of the observed annual temperature extremes in the 21st century against reconstructed long-term climate means of the Holocene and before. Like all science, climate science is tentative and fallible.

This is a big step for a publication like Nature Magazine to publish this kind of open questioning of the climate narrative.

As misguided climate policies increasingly impact real people’s daily lives, people increasingly pay attention.

Together, let’s ensure that as people question the climate narrative, the straight facts are easy to find.