As a pseudoscientific advocate for climate alarmism the IPCC is unparalleled.
Here are a few glaring examples of a favorite climate fallacy: Stating speculation as though it were fact. Not surprisingly much of this junk comes out of computer models. As with the previous article, I am posting a few of the so-called "Key Messages" fr
No CO2 caused global warming over the entire satellite temperature record?
Every comment counts.
These reports are supposedly summarizing the existing scientific literature, but in reality the merely choose and use scholarly citations to support the one-sided argument for alarmism.
The review committee includes no one willing to correct the flaws in the assessment.
Things still seem to be going downhill for the EU, or at least for the left-wing elements of it.
The use of wildly speculative and extreme modeling is spreading throughout the government, with potentially destructive consequences.
The second shoe has dropped in EPA's wondering about how to regulate CO2 emissions from power plants. As the shoe dropping metaphor suggests, EPA can now go to sleep for awhile. Everyone else is going to be very busy commenting on this complex issue. The first shoe dropped in October when EPA proposed repeal of the Obama Clean Power Plan. The Agency correctly cited the well known legal arguments against the CPP, especially that it illegally required States to regulate their entire electric power systems, not just their power plants. This meant changing (that is, restricting) people's use of electricity, a favorite [...]
Climate change alarmism is driven by computer modeling and the IPCC. The IPCC modeling is a collective activity, led by the US Department of Energy. The Trump Administration has not touched this DOE scare factory, but should rein it in.
Earlier this month there was an actual debate, at the Colorado State University, Pueblo, Colorado. The slides are available online and they tell a remarkable story about the emptiness of alarmism.
The rich West wants to stop using coal while the poor East depends on it. Germany is caught in the middle. The future of the EU may turn on this issue, because East-West tensions are already great.
The alarmist science community lives on studies that claim to find that "It's worse than we thought" and two beauties have just come out. It is all just computer games but the green press loves it.
It looks like EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt has a good procedural argument for reopening the Obama era false finding that CO2 emissions endanger human health and welfare.
In a normal coalition the parties first develop a joint platform, where everyone agrees to the position on all major issues. Under KoKo they merely agree to a few issues that mean a lot to the left.