At COP25, the United Nations pushes political propaganda rather than objective science. To the limited extent science is presented, it is one-sided and resting on flimsy evidence.
Wine must be getting more popular, as climate alarmists are increasingly claiming global warming is harming wine production.
Wind turbines are explicitly permitted to kill without penalty bald eagles and other iconic, protected American birds in staggering numbers.
As COP 25 gets going in Madrid, global warming alarmists are continuing their world tour of wine alarmism, now claiming climate change is decimating Napa Valley wine.
In Madrid for the UN Conference of the Parties on climate change (COP25), the UN booted the people from the royal palace.
The objective data show wine production in Italy, the rest of Europe, and the rest of the world are all doing quite fine.
The catalyst for Chile's riots was a rise in Santiago Metro prices made necessary by carbon dioxide taxes and a conversion of the Metro from conventional power to renewable energy.
Given the deadly impact of wind turbines, wind power apologists would be wise to never mention the topic of energy and wildlife deaths.
The NYT ran an article claiming that global warming will be more expensive than we think. Not so fast, Naomi.
If global warming is responsible for declining coffee production, why are we enjoying record global coffee crops?
Cold weather that reduced the apple harvest was the result of global warming? Really? Meanwhile Europe is rolling in apples...
Big money is flowing into the "Climate Emergency Fund," an organized campaign to disrupt society via climate protests.
The article would be better titled, “The earth is warming. Here is how alarmists misrepresent a modest, beneficial warming to appear like a crisis.”
When activists give massive amounts of money to public universities and government agencies for the primary purpose of advancing global warming alarmism, those universities and government agencies lose any hint of objectivity and credibility.
Can't let a little thing like historical data interfere with the global warming narrative.