Artificial leaf to improve solar power?

Tree leaves are good at providing shade, but could they also provide insight into how to produce abundant energy?  Well according to a team of international scientists, the answer is "yes," as leaves have been churning out energy by soaking in the sun's rays for millennia. As reported in Energy and Environment Daily, these scientists are attempting to produce artificial leaves that could do much the same thing as their natural counterparts by copying the process where chlorosomes work to create photosynthesis.  If successful, the newly manufactured leaves would create energy much more efficiently than current solar photovoltaic technology, [...]

By
|2009-08-04T00:00:00-04:00August 4th, 2009|Comments Off on Artificial leaf to improve solar power?

Polls shows opposition to climate bill

Does the American public believe cap and trade legislation on global warming will hurt our economy?  Well according to recent polling by Rasmussen, roughly 50% of the public believe this climate bill will definitely hurt the economy, while only 19% say it would actually help.  Strangely, two-thirds of those surveyed who work in the field of politics agree with the minority that cap and trade will provide an economic boon! In yet another poll, the National Center for Public Policy Research found that nearly three quarters of African Americans would rather see economic recovery be a top priority than [...]

By
|2009-08-03T00:00:00-04:00August 3rd, 2009|Comments Off on Polls shows opposition to climate bill

Millions of jobs at risk U.S. climate con-job

  Global Warming is the centerpiece of White House revenue-generation and energy policies. A mind-numbing 1,500-page bill would tax, regulate and penalize all U.S. hydrocarbon energy use to “save the planet” from climate Armageddon. Not one member read the legislation, but the House passed it 219 to 212. The Senate promises an August vote. However, average global temperatures peaked in 1998 and since have fallen slightly, even as carbon-dioxide levels continued climbing. Thousands of scientists say CO{-2} has little effect on planetary temperatures, and there is no climate crisis. The legislation would cost millions of jobs and trillions of dollars for [...]

By
|2009-07-29T11:48:53-04:00July 29th, 2009|Comments Off on Millions of jobs at risk U.S. climate con-job

Gore: U.S. climate bill to bring global governance

Former Vice President Al Gore declared that the Congressional climate bill will help bring about “global governance.” “I bring you good news from the U.S.," Gore said on July 7, 2009 in Oxford at the Smith School World Forum on Enterprise and the Environment, sponsored by UK Times. “Just two weeks ago, the House of Representatives passed the Waxman-Markey climate bill,” Gore said, noting it was “very much a step in the right direction.” President Obama has pushed for the passage of the bill in the Senate and attended a G8 summit this week where he agreed to attempt to keep the [...]

By
|2009-07-13T12:27:02-04:00July 13th, 2009|Comments Off on Gore: U.S. climate bill to bring global governance

Waxman-Markey: Intense pain, no eco gain

Even a $600-a-year increase in utility bills would be a "hardship" for 78% of American families, notes a recent Lauer Johnson Research poll. They should be so lucky. If the pending Waxman-Markey energy and climate bill (HR 2454) becomes law, utility bills will soar. Farm and business energy costs will skyrocket — and be passed on to consumers, or defrayed by layoffs. Everything Americans grow, make, buy and do will be far pricier. And bureaucrats will control our lives. Compared to no cap-and-tax regime, Waxman-Markey would cost the United States a cumulative $9.6 trillion in real GDP losses by 2035, concludes [...]

By
|2009-07-13T12:05:01-04:00July 13th, 2009|Comments Off on Waxman-Markey: Intense pain, no eco gain

Climate Depot in the news

Marc Morano, the editor in chief of CFACT’s groundbreaking new website ClimateDepot.com, has been stirring up quite a fuss lately reporting all the latest news and developments in the fight against global warming alarmists like Al Gore.  Morano has been cited by three major news outlets in as many days.  On July 7, Sean Hannity of FOX News cited ClimateDepot.com and gave this comment: “Al Gore may have some explaining to do. It's been over three years since his global warming propaganda film hit theaters and, since that time, ClimateDepot.com reports that the Earth's temperature has actually dropped.” In an article [...]

By
|2012-10-19T18:04:11-04:00July 8th, 2009|Comments Off on Climate Depot in the news

EPA suppresses report

Alan Carlin, a senior operations research analyst who has worked at the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for 38 years, alleges the agency has suppressed his most recent report on the CO2 Endangerment Finding.  In this video, he appears on FOX News to discuss the situation. In the report, which can be found here, Carlin says that the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis fails “the ultimate scientific test—conformance with real world data.”  He also criticizes the EPA’s acceptance of “the findings reached by outside groups, particularly the IPCC and the CCSP, as being correct without a careful and critical examination of their conclusions [...]

By
|2009-07-08T09:07:15-04:00July 8th, 2009|Comments Off on EPA suppresses report

EPA action endangers good public policy

  Advocates of climate change have become increasingly shrill in their alarmist claims of doom and gloom lately, arguing in recent weeks (as reported in CFACT’s Climate Depot) that global warming will kill millions through droughts and floods, bring humanity back to the Stone Age, and (perhaps even most troubling) is responsible for costing Tiger Woods a U.S. Open championship. Incredibly, they are quick to ridicule any skeptic who would question their alarmist cries, and some even advocate putting such nay-sayers on trial for “crimes against humanity.” Now comes word that EPA might have gone so far as to mute a [...]

By
|2009-07-08T08:46:14-04:00July 8th, 2009|Comments Off on EPA action endangers good public policy

Time to re-engage debate on global warming science

  To a large degree, the debate over global warming has been confined to the realm of science vs. economics.  Anyone viewing the House debate over the Waxman-Markey bill could not miss how proponents of the legislation relied upon their unyielding belief that the “science is settled” with respect to climate change, and how the planet is imperiled from a rapidly warming planet.  On the other hand, opponents of the legislation cited endless studies and statistics about the economic damage that would ensue should this far-reaching legislation become law.  Lost in the debate, however, was any substantive discussion of the actual [...]

By
|2009-07-08T08:36:41-04:00July 8th, 2009|Comments Off on Time to re-engage debate on global warming science

Should Big Brother inventory your life?

By Ryan Nichols Marc Morano reported on ClimateDepot.com that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) is touring China. She's there in part to promote the Administration's "Green" agenda that will cost millions of American jobs and restrict the freedoms of US citizens. The Associated Press quoted Pelosi saying the following when she was asked how Americans can cut back the size of their carbon footprints: Excerpt from the May 28, 2009 AP article: In answering a question from a student about how Pelosi was going to get Americans to cut back on their carbon emissions, the leading Democratic lawmaker said it was [...]

By
|2009-06-24T00:00:00-04:00June 24th, 2009|Comments Off on Should Big Brother inventory your life?

What does Sotomayor mean for the environment?

By Evan Dent I recently ran across a blog post on Green Hell Blog that discusses President Obama's recent Supreme Court nominee, Sonya Sotomayor. According to the blog, Sotomayor is definitely on the side of extremely left leaning green environmental groups. For example, she ruled in favor of a group sueing the EPA for allowing cost-benefit analysis at a power plant for its water cooling intake structures. It's a shame that Judges in high-power positions are so willing to rule in favor of environmental activists and their initiatives, despite the blatant negative impacts it wouldhave on all ofthe tax-payingconsumers! As the [...]

By
|2009-06-22T00:00:00-04:00June 22nd, 2009|Comments Off on What does Sotomayor mean for the environment?
Go to Top