The only winner in the renewable energy sweepstakes is BIG Government.
Those who believe in the existence of adequate non-fossil alternatives essential to achieve a "carbon-neutral" U.S. — much less global — energy balance anytime soon, or at any cost, are dreadfully misguided.
They had never seen a company ask for tax abatements when its project would create only two full-time jobs.
Intermittent wind and solar can't keep the shelves stocked and people moving.
Harvard's Dr. Willie Soon probed the long history in the quest to understand the role the Sun plays in our ever changing climate. WATCH NOW.
Batteries are too expensive to back up intermittent wind and solar.
What about wind and solar? We feel like they’re clean because we don’t burn them. Well… not directly. But, let’s be real.
"Clean" energy is not so simple. WATCH NOW.
The extensive intermittency of renewable power makes any cost savings irrelevant, because the cost to overcome the intermittency is astronomical.
By Mary Kay Barton: Big wind and solar are neither Green, nor efficient.
BY RON STEIN: The San Bernardino County's Board of Supervisors slammed the brakes on big solar projects and highlighted a challenge California could face if it seeks to eliminate the use of fossil fuels.
What happens when – in the name of combating climate change – gigantic, industrial-sized renewable energy projects are thrust upon unsuspecting rural communities?
There's nothing "clean," nor "green" about locating and extracting all the lithium, cobalt and rare-earth's these schemes require.
Wind and solar aren't an efficient way to power the grid on a nice day. When extreme weather strikes they are outright dangerous.
Climate alarmists must prove expensive, weather-dependent energy is green and sustainable