Fracking yields trillions in benefits!

By |2013-07-29T18:59:57+00:00July 29th, 2013|CFACT Insights|7 Comments

Signs of pride and prosperity were evident all over Williamsport and the gorgeous northern Pennsylvania countryside around it. Friendly, happy people greeted us. New cars, trucks, hotels and restaurants sparkled in a clean, bustling downtown. New roofs topped barns and houses, while late model tractors worked the fields. Formerly dirt roads are now paved.

Men and women again have high-paying jobs, young people are coming back instead of moving away, their salaries are supporting other businesses and jobs, and many are taking college programs in oilfield technical and business specialties, Vince Matteo told me.

As President and CEO of the Williamsport/Lycoming County Chamber of Commerce, he’s witnessed the transformation: “98 percent of the change has been positive,” he says. Contributions to United Way are increasing each year, county infrastructure has improved enormously, and environmental impacts are minimal.

Visits to several Anadarko Petroleum drilling and fracking sites explained why. The operations are far more high-tech than what I had seen previously on rigs in the Rocky Mountains, off the Louisiana and California coasts, and last fall in Alberta’s oil sands region. Hydraulic fracturing was first employed in Kansas in 1947. But steadily improved fracking technology is now combined with computers, down-hole sensors and microseismic instruments. Drilling equipment lets crews send a bit 6,000 feet down and 8,000 feet laterally into Marcellus Shale formations – and end up within 3 feet of their intended target!

The operations are conducted from atop a multi-layered felt and impermeable plastic pad, surrounded by a berm, to keep unlikely spills from contaminating farm and forest land. Multiple wells are drilled from a single pad and “kicked out” horizontally in various directions. The drilling rig is skidded a short distance to four or five more locations around the pad, the entire array is fractured at high pressure, and short wellheads are installed to collect natural gas, and send it to local and interstate pipeline networks.

A nearby impoundment is also lined with plastic to hold water for fracturing operations. Topsoil removed to prepare the pad and pond is stored nearby. As operations are finished, the land is reclaimed, topsoil is replaced, and local grasses, flowers and shrubs are planted, to create meadows for deer and wild turkeys – or anything else the landowners prefer.To launch 20-40 years of hydrocarbon production from a 15,000-acre (23-square-mile) area requires barely 2% surface disturbance, most of it for just a few months.

Once the work is completed, the area quietly and unobtrusively produces decades of energy – and revenue for farmers, wildlife organizations, hunting groups, and local, state and federal treasuries.

Hydraulic fracturing takes place some 5,500 feet (almost four Empire State Buildings) below the water table. To prevent groundwater contamination, pipe penetrating the first seven hundred feet is surrounded by layers of steel casing and specialized cement. During the drilling and fracturing process, even rainwater collected from the drill pad is saved and used. Some of the water used to fracture the shale is also recovered during gas production; this “flowback” water itself is filtered, treated and reused.

The hydraulic fracturing process requires some 2.0-4.2 million gallons of water per well, but fresh or brackish water works equally well. A 2013 Ceres study concluded that hydraulic fracturing consumed 75 billion gallons of water per year on average nationwide, in 2011 and 2012. EPA says fracking consumes 70-140 billion gallons a year nationally, and the Texas Water Resources Board estimates that Lone Star State oil and natural gas companies used 27 billion gallons of water for fracking statewide in 2011.

However, Texas homeowners used 495 billion gallons for lawns and gardens, the TWRB found (18 times what fracking consumed), and household landscape irrigation nationwide consumes nearly 3 trillion gallons of water annually, according to EPA (21-43 times the EPA and Ceres estimates for hydraulic fracturing).

Even more revealing, according to the U.S. Department of Energy, fracking requires just 0.6 to 5.8 gallons of water per million Btu of energy produced. By comparison, “renewable” and “sustainable” corn-based ethanol requires 2,510 to 29,100 gallons per million Btu of usable energy – and biodiesel from soybeans consumes an astounding and unsustainable 14,000 to 75,000 gallons of water per million Btu!

As to chemical contamination, fracturing fluids are 99.5% water and sand. Moreover, the 0.5% chemicals portion is increasingly basic, nontoxic household or kitchen stuff. Anadarko’s chemicals today are only “slickeners” (to help the sand get further into cracks created by the pressurized water) and “biocides” that prevent bacterial buildup in the well pipes. Which chemicals are used for any single well in the United States can be determined by going to – and every EPA, DOE and other study conducted to date has concluded that fracking has never contaminated a single US well.

Hydraulic fracturing has created 1.7 million new direct and indirect jobs in the United States, with the total likely to rise to 3 million jobs over the next seven years, IHS Global Insight reports. It has injected billions into North Dakota, Pennsylvania, Texas, and other state economies. It’s added $62 billion to federal and state treasuries, with that total expected to rise to $111 billion by 2020. By 2035, U.S. oil and natural gas operations could provide over $5 trillion in cumulative capital expenditures into the economy, while generating over $2.5 trillion in cumulative additional government revenues.

In the process, fracking has revived America’s petrochemical, steel and other manufacturing industries, and reinvigorated American ingenuity and economic competitiveness. One shudders to think how awful the US unemployment, part-time employment and economic picture would be in its absence.

This game-changing technology has also transformed U.S., EU and global political equations and power structures. With the United States, Argentina, Britain, China, Israel, and many other countries collectively sitting atop centuries’ worth of now economically producible oil and natural gas, OPEC and Russia can no longer control prices and threaten customer nations. For poor developing countries, natural gas from shale provides fuel to generate abundant, affordable electricity that will transform lives.

Then why do Hollywood and radical greens celebrate misleading films like Gasland and Promised Land – even after Phelim McAleer and Ann McElhinney’s documentary FrackNation completely demolished Gasland‘s lies and half-truths? Why do outfits like Food and Water Watch and the Sierra Club, and ill-informed activists like Yoko Ono, continue to scream hysterical nonsense about the process?

Follow the money – and the ideology. Big Eco is big business, and big egos. It seeks ever more power and every greater control over our lives. Fracking threatens all of that.

“What you get in your mailbox is a never-ending stream of crisis-related shrill material designed to evoke emotions,” former National Audubon Society COO Dan Beard once admitted, “so that you will sit down and write a check” – or click the “Donate Now” button. This multi-billion-dollar-per-year industry would collapse without the crisis du jour it conjures up, with help from the news media, politicians and regulators.

Deep Ecology adherents view fossil fuels as evil incarnate, and believe fervently in “peak oil” and Climate Armageddon. They are frustrated that fracking guarantees a hydrocarbon renaissance and predominance for decades to come, and helps reduce carbon dioxide emissions without massive economic sacrifice.

They also tend to be well-off, and clueless about the true sources of modern living standards. They have disturbingly callous attitudes about people who have lost their jobs because of Mr. Obama’s war on coal and cheap energy – and about poor rural New York families that are barely hanging onto their farms, unable to tap the Marcellus Shale riches beneath their land, because Governor Cuomo refuses to lift his moratorium on fracking. Many don’t give a spotted owl hoot about the world’s impoverished billions, whose hope for better lives depends on the reliable, affordable electricity that “frack gas” can help bring.

These shameful attitudes hurt people and planet. We need to frack for a better, cleaner, happier world!


  1. jameshrust July 30, 2013 at 4:50 PM

    We are producing over 12 billion gallons ethanol per year from 5 billion bushels of corn. It takes about 150 gallons of water to convert corn into a gallon of ethanol. However, you must also consider the water needed to grown corn. A Purdue University study cited 18 inches of rainfall or irrigation to produce a good yield of corn. This translates to another 1400 gallons of water per gallon of ethanol if you get 150 bushels per acre of corn. Our water use for ethanol is about 20 trillion gallons per year. This is more than all human use. Biofuels are insane waste of resources and money. Fracking, EPA’s next target, can lead the United States to great wealth.
    James H. Rust, Professor of nuclear engineering

    • J.P. Katigbak July 30, 2013 at 11:05 PM

      I hope that the fracking process for shale oil production can lead the United States to great wealth – and other meaningful ideas challenge the ideological and philosophical doctrine of environmentalism that pervades and adversely affects various societies and economies around the world.

      Now is the time to stop the activist ideologues from yielding too much power over people’s daily lives. GET GOING, OK? Thanks very much. – J.P.K.

      • Maud Nordwald Pollock August 11, 2013 at 12:58 PM

        I am choked that this article appears from this organization. I wondered what their agenda was, now I know the Fraking industry is paying the bills. Fraking is insidious and dangerous, and uses lots of water, and we don’t need it, we don’t need it we don’t need it. There are alternative ways for producing energy that are covered up. Inventors killed take a look at the documentary “Thrive” all the info is there, just follow the money honey!!! So please don’t buy into is destructive, disturbs our planet, causes earthquakes, and makes a lot of money for psychopaths who do not care what they do to our environment ..They are no different from the Global warming fraudsters,,,So much for that cfact….!!!

  2. Eckenhuijsen Smit July 31, 2013 at 1:04 PM

    Barry Hussein Obama is the greatest threat for
    worldwide prosperity, as he himself professed to be, before even his first
    election! So his millions of communist/socialist followers are just happy that Barry
    tells them that manmade CO2 is the cause of Global Warming and of Global
    Climate Change. Of course Barry is too dumb to understand that CO2 is
    indispensable for all life on earth as it has been for eons. In fact it is
    completely unimportant if CO2 is or is not liberated into the atmosphere
    because of fracking or any other human activity. Human CO2 is only 0,001152 % ≈
    nil of the atmosphere, but Barry doesn’t know that, or if he knows, he will go
    on lying about it, just as he lies about every aspect in life! Which is exactly
    the reason why he should be impeached by Congress and Senate

    • J.P. Katigbak July 31, 2013 at 10:26 PM

      I know you want US president Barack Obama to be impeached by US Congress someday over which political correctness (including the ideological and philosophical doctrine of environmentalism) the leftists are imposing upon various societies and economies around the world.

      And not just those on the left who are imposing such beliefs – there are those belonging to the Right are doing the different kinds of beliefs that are not compatible to good, tried-and-tested traditional values and customs, traditional institutions (including the institution of monarchy), greater political stability, peaceful diplomatic relations between various countries, better, more stable economic growth and social well-being, more meaningful environmental protection, and many, many more.

      And as for CO2 (carbon dioxide), it is still indispensable for all life on earth and it is very unimportant if CO2 is or is not liberated into the atmosphere despite of the pervasively political correctness sentiments that have pushed public discussions too far from reality around the globe.

      I wonder why are those beliefs of political correctness still there? That is all too often now. Better take a stand, ladies and gentlemen, because it is payback time in the public discussions, GOT THAT? And do not forget to challenge those who hold viewpoints of political correctness – that the idea of political correctness is still a BANE to various societies and economies around the world.

      People including me will not ever give up and walk away like cowards in the present situation. There is much more to fight for what I mentioned above. Take care as always and God bless you. – J.P.K.

  3. J.P. Katigbak August 11, 2013 at 7:55 PM

    The question over the existence of an ideological and philosophical doctrine of environmentalism and other sorts of political correctness is still be left to be desire, as far as I am concerned. How will it be tackled well when political correctness is still there? Will it be true? How will CFACT and other meaningful groups know well about the actual threat of such a situation that pervades the public discussion across the globe? Why is that happening when political correctness still exists?

    The intellectual battle is far from over, and CFACT and other groups mentioned need to build a good strategy that would work well, not just a new strategy, in challenging the politically correct doctrines that have infuriated people who have a good reason to understand the truth regarding concerns affecting the internationally broad energy sector.

    They need to GET GOING before trouble sets in. It is important to reveal the politically-correct motivations by targeting them the right way during debates and public discussions, and review what the both sides did. Need to suggest more about how to reveal such motivations very well?

    Please, do not give up in challenging the ideological and philosophical doctrine of environmentalism and other sorts of politically correct doctrines that are still a bane to various societies and economies around the world. Keep on fighting still against those who are trying to suppress the truth about the pervasive existence of politically correctness.

    I am personally disappointed at the lack of any meaningful discussion about the kind of situation – and I am not making this up, OK? So, please, do not hesitate in doing so. It is never too late in preventing such a misunderstanding over social and economic issues from happening too much.

    Thanks very much. – J.P.K.

  4. gobrenda3 September 18, 2013 at 4:48 PM

    When people get more and more poor because they have to pay $3.70-$4.00 for a gallon of gas- more of more of them will start waking up. Obama is a dictator, plain and simple, who wants to control all of us. He knows if he controls the energy, then he can control the money and the people. VOTE CONSERVATIVE!!!!!!

Comments are closed.