See “Climate Hustle” the film that exposes the tricks and traps of the global warming campaign as no other film before or since! July 12th Melbourne, July 15th Brisbane, July 18th Sydney.

Should we take a second look at “smart meters?” WATCH NOW

CFACT policy analyst Larry Bell calls out Ben Santer, Kerry Emanual, and Naomi Oreskes for their shrill opposition to genuine peer review that might well expose fake science. And for good reason. Santer is one of the top perpetrators of false and misleading information through his work with the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

CFACT Senior Policy Analyst Paul Driessen, with climatologist David Legates, asks those who claim that “we are still in” the Paris climate accord pay their equal share of the U.S. payment mandated by the Paris accords? How also will they justify the loss of jobs, revenues, and even the health of their constituents — almost all of whom were not consulted when these leaders made their high-sounding pronouncements — all of whom did so without providing a pathway for making the payments to the UN or the early retirement of fossil fuel power sources and replacement with the massive, very expensive wind and solar and biomass units needed to keep America’s electrical grid functional without major interruptions in service? The fact is that none of these blowhards can answer these questions, so they prefer to ignore them, hoping they will not have to do so.

“I don’t want to just hope the wind blows to light up your homes and your factories,” Trump told supporters at a rally in Iowa. “As the birds fall to the ground.”

By John Rafuse   President Trump’s budget guidance sought to cut $1.6 billion from the Environmental Protection Agency’s $8.1 billion expectation. Shrieks of looming Armageddon prompted Congress to fund the EPA in full until September 2017, when the battle will be joined again. Then EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt said he would prioritize Superfund cleanups based […]

The usual suspects just can’t resist attributing natural heat waves to global warming.

Must students truly be taught the hectoring pronouncements of climate alarmists as incontrovertible truth, but be denied knowledge of the facts that expose their dogma?

Nuclear provides the cleanest power, yet environmental groups will soon petition South Carolina regulators to shut down partially-completed reactors in an attempt to boost subsidies for inefficient wind and solar.

Given the pressures, it is impressive that teachers want to teach the entire climate debate.

CFACT policy analyst Larry Bell chronicles the hysteria over climate change over the past 100 years– starting in 1922 when the Washington Post predicted most coastal cities would be uninhabitable “within a few years.” But by 1974 Time Magazine was warning of an impending Ice Age. It was back to warming by 1989 — but the warming trend fizzled out by the end of the world (er, Y2K) — leaving money-hungry activists with “climate change” as their solgan word — a term now defined as anything that happens is bad but we at the UN can just have all of your money,

The rants of pesticide-hating environmentalists may theaten the honeybee population much more than the subject of their rage — neonicotinoid pesticides that destroy Varroa destructor mites that actually do kill millions of bees. CFACT Senior Policy Analyst Paul Driessen explains that the installation of a beehive on the Vice President’s residence could focus on how to protect bees from these vicious, though tiny, predators that suck the bee’s hemolymph blood-equivalent out of them, compromising their immune systems and vectoring in a dozen of more viruses and diseases into honeybees and colonies.

There’s something fishy about MSN.com’s claims about Antarctica.

Minds are opening and the media doesn’t like it.

This isn’t the first time scientists have been stymied by thick Arctic sea ice.

Long-term climate simulations have never come close to being accurate.

More than 70 percent of climate models underestimated the amount of rain compared to real world observations.

The hard economic and environmental realities of wind, solar, and biofuels “alternatives” to fossil fuels will likely awaken other leaders – and persuade other nations to Exit Paris.

Cities and states can increase costs but they won’t change global temperature.