I can’t resist! This simply must be said. I never attack someone personally, but I will argue with ideas. When it comes to people on the other side of the climate issues, there are a lot of them that just walk into easily countered traps. I can’t figure it out. Do they not know if they are going to say something, almost always there is a counter argument? Or do they, but figure no one will call them on it. Quite frankly and off this matter, the President could have absolutely annihilated Joe Biden on climate. Especially since he made the [...]
Basically they co-opted a correct forecast made from natural reasons, and then decided to pile on with their missive, and that part is easily countered.
The facts on fire tell the real story.
Numerous articles and statements weaponizing weather events to push an agenda have shown up of late. This is predictable given the time of the year when we are experiencing both hurricane season and and election cyclone. I coined the term, "weaponizing the weather" several years ago and it forms part of the title of my new book. Given the onslaught I see, I almost wish I had not, because it seems people didn't realize it was a warning, not a recommendation. It seems we get a new weather exaggeration every day. Kamala Harris joined in saying, "California, like so many other [...]
Well will all due respect, Mother Earth has been a lot angrier before.
People like this understand we have increasingly become a society based on fear.
Several years ago, I coined a term -- the "weaponization of the weather." It absolutely destroys people's love of the weather.
I cannot figure out how the usual suspects don’t stop and say, wait a minute, maybe I should look and make sure that there is not a counter argument.
Tropical revolving storms can be a fright, but the trend remains normal.
Obviously the person making this statement either does not know these facts, or does and simply seeks to hide them to push a false missive.
There was nothing "unprecedented" about this week's tropical activity in the Gulf.
A whimsical, satirical, sarcastic, not funny, none of the above ,or all of the above look at settled science
Human induced climate change is to many settled Science. So 2 questions come to mind 1) What is Settled Science? 2) If its settled science, why are we spending so much money researching it? When I think of Settled Science I don’t think of something that many people far smarter than I, with degrees at levels I can only dream about, would disagree with what has become a “consensus”. If it’s a done deal, why are they debating it. But there are many that don't agree about the extent of man caused warming, but their voices are being suppressed. That does [...]
Tropical storm activity remains historically normal.
Checking the Isaias details.
“We’re facing down the barrel of a gun with climate change, and particularly young people are looking for businesses and government to step up,” cofounder of Allbirds Joey Zwillinger. This Begs the Question: If it’s a Gun is it a Toy Gun?