Does Google put its finger on the scale when we search?
When it comes to the climate change debate, biased mainstream media is no longer significant. Blacklisting skeptics will not work. Sorry "Nature."
Google appears to have three degrees of bias, each more extreme
Alarmists hide behind the journals that they control as a shield
Google's authority based search algorithms are rigged to favor liberal content.
Johnson's position on climate change is unclear.
We are not dealing with a mere bartender here. We are dealing with a policy expert who happens to have tended bar.
YouTube is full of well argued skeptical science. The problem seems to be that the alarmists simply do not understand the debate.
It might be fascinating to see computers that ingest thousands of articles debating each other.
Simply put, an algorithm is not a mind.
The Left insists on taking Trump's jokes literally, which exposes them as joyless ideologues, and makes the President all the more fun.
Populism is not a dirty word. It means democracy.
Climate crisis crusaders are very unhappy about the first two Democrat candidate debates.
Some people now want a separate climate debate, but the powers that be are resisting. This is now called the "debate debate".
Having hitched their wagon to the unicorn of climate catastrophe, the Democrat candidates for president are caught between a rock and a very hard place.