"The point is to have a genuine debate. It will result in a summary, giving an overview of the issues the scientists agree and don’t agree on. This list will be the source of a new global climate research program that is supported by all parties."
Climate models systematically exaggerate future global warming.
The difference between the real world and the modeled world has already existed for 30 years. Unfortunately, instead of getting smaller due to a proper validation process, this difference has become bigger.
CLINTEL is a rapidly growing international group, led by prominent scientists, that opposes the ill-founded attempts to scare people into hasty climate policy actions.
Greta Thunberg is calling for ruinous climate policies that make no sense. That's what you get when you farm out energy policy to a clueless propaganda tool.
Science writer and blogger Jo Nova has done something's truly remarkable. She has done a running in-depth analysis of both the fires and the absurd climate claims made by the alarmists.
The National Federation of Teachers is promoting the teaching of Action Now! climate radicalism in America's English classes.
President Trump should help poor nations by directing USAID to support coal and gas, not just wind and solar
Greenpeace and Green Party cage match!
Africa must move forward without them, using fossil and nuclear energy to build prosperity.
I expect to see a lot of meaninglessly symbolic green action in response to the hysterical noise-making, but skeptics have a chance to win big in 2020.
If the Action Now! radicals continue their intransigence then the Paris Accord is essentially dead.
The proponents of this planless nonsense gleefully admit they have no idea how to make it work.
Loss and Damage (L&D) is the name of the hugely dangerous issue whereby developed countries would compensate the developing world for damages caused by things like bad weather and rising seas, in the name of climate change.
COP 25 has an abundance of funny stuff going on. Just hold you nose.