Failure to acknowledge the scientific climate change debate is making science look like a political tool. This can only turn out badly for science.
The US Department of Justice has issued a wish list of reform laws aimed directly at the big Internet media giants.
The proposed site is around 30 miles offshore of the giant Norfolk naval complex.
President Trump issued an Executive Order targeting viewpoint discrimination by Big Tech social media companies.
If Greta Thunberg is an alarmist princess then Katherine Hayhoe is the queen of climate alarmism.
Dominion Energy loves all these enormous expenses, because the more they spend the more they make. It is the rate payers that should revolt.
Believing these computer models means trusting the makers.
Here is their panicky title: "Unsuitable for 'human life to flourish': Up to 3B will live in extreme heat by 2070, study warns"
According to CLINTEL the primary obstacle to efficient adaptation is the pernicious influence of supranational organizations, wielding computer models and calling for unworkable technological fixes.
How can we substitute smart policy for catastrophic computer model panics in future?
Green Deal's will cost a fortune.
A gatebreaker is something a skeptical student can send around to the class when the teacher insists on alarmism. Or something short and simple to send to a journalist in response to an alarmist article, or to a politician making alarmist speeches, or the local blowhard alarmist. It's power lies in its specificity and its simplicity.
The only climate model that agrees with observations says there is NO climate emergency. Meanwhile half of the IPCC models are getting hotter than ever before.
The vast sums proposed to be spent under dubious national Green New Deals should be spent instead on health care, especially virus prevention and protection.
The past 150 years show that affordable and reliable energy is the key to prosperity.