Climate crisis crusaders are very unhappy about the first two Democrat candidate debates.
Some people now want a separate climate debate, but the powers that be are resisting. This is now called the "debate debate".
Having hitched their wagon to the unicorn of climate catastrophe, the Democrat candidates for president are caught between a rock and a very hard place.
Hypothetical vulnerability analyses are in no sense realistic threat assessments.
Flooding often occurs in drought prone places. So the water that is hurting us is actually very valuable, if we could store it, which is just what dams do. We are flooding ourselves with valuable water. How stupid is that?
The center has fallen out of the political EU
The intermittent nature of wind and solar means they often won't be there when needed.
"When I was a boy of fourteen, my father was so ignorant I could hardly stand to have the old man around. But when I got to be twenty-one, I was astonished at how much he had learned in seven years."--Mark Twain.
Rising star presidential candidate Beto O'Rourke has put out his own version of the Green New Deal. It is milder than AOC's monstrosity but it is still a multi-trillion dollar monstrosity.
Big oil companies are putting at least a billion dollars into alarmist projects and lobbying.
Batteries are too expensive to back up intermittent wind and solar.
The stark contrast between Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Will Happer says a great deal about the state of the climate change debate. It is radical versus reason.
Hydro is still our biggest and most reliable renewable energy supplier.
Our national flood control system is only half built and we need to finish it.
The "green wave" of utilities shutting down coal fired power plants in the name of climate change has hit a rock, with bigger rocks to come.