Marc Morano: We are in an era of unusually low extreme weather. So, as CO2 has risen, our weather has gotten less extreme.
Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!
38 Comments
Comments are closed.
Marc Morano: We are in an era of unusually low extreme weather. So, as CO2 has risen, our weather has gotten less extreme.
Comments are closed.
Give me pictures with your articles. They go further that way. https://www.facebook.com/newlittleiceage/?ref=bookmarks
Says Marc Morano who has no climate science credentials. None whatsoever.
And Bill Nye does?
And Al Gore does?
Don’t rely on Al Gore then. Read what actual scientists and scientific agencies are concluding.
https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/
You mean the scientist and scientific agencies the distort and manipulate and outright lie about their data to “prove” there is anthropogenic global warming?
“…outright lies?”…according to who exactly? Please substantiate and share. You are simply repeating a silly talking point manufactured by disinformation professionals to intentionally mislead and misinform. Why do you accept this rubbish so readily?
If you actually follow the new reports on the subject you would see the numerous reports of fraud by NOAA and ICCP and others. You’d have to live under a rock to not see all of the report on how they lie and manipulate the data.
“the numerous reports of fraud by NOAA and ICCP and others”
And who are the authors of these numerous reports. Please substantiate your unsupported statements
As I said, anyone with a half a brain can find dozens of such reports. I’m not going to hold your hand and spoonfeed you the information which is readily available. I don’t have to substantiate anything. Check it out for yourself I’m assuming you’re a smart guy (maybe a bad assumption?).
“dozens of such reports”. Published and written by who, and with what credentials? You can’t produce a single credible report.
I’m busy living my life and have read the reports by qualified scientist of which I speak. I don’t have time to do your research. Do it yourself instead of setting there on your high horse trolling people. Geez you’re lazy.
“…I’m busy living my life and have read the report…I don’t have time to do your research…Geez you’re lazy”
>> Says slothful frequenter of Gossip Cop and other rubbish sites. You can’t produce a single credible report to substantiate your outrageous statement. Not one.
Please inform yourself about the science, evidence and implications of climate change instead of spreading disinformation: https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/
I can provide numerous reports to support my claims, but I won’t, because people like you will never have their minds changed from believing their own fantasies and theories derived from inherently unscientific methods and fraud. I’m done wasting my time with you. A Century from now people will laugh their asses off over people like you. I’m laughing now. hahahahahahahaha!!!
“I can provide numerous reports to support my claims…blah, blah”
>> But you haven’t so your claims are entirely worthless. Your fantasies not mine.
Hey, Gary – Don’t fall into this trap.
“Ian5” is none other than Michael Mann – determined to waste your time by asking questions which need lengthy answers; and take up a lot of your time. Then he ignores the answers, saying that they’ve “been debunked”… Any real evidence presented is simply ignored.
Yet you haven’t provided any evidence, only childish name calling.
uh, you mean… Climate Scientologists…Those dolts aren’t scientists.
Who the are the scientists then smartipants?
Start with William Happer, Freeman Dyson, and Richard Lindzen. Art Robinson is a brilliant guy with a stellar background as well. But there are many notables in the skeptic community right now. Willie Soon, Ryan Maui, Judith Curry, Roy Spencer and John Christy, and others who have recently passed away, like Hal Lewis and Reid Bryson (The father of Climatology)
What are yours?
Deflection. I have not been selected by fox news as a commentator. Again, given that Morano has no scientific credentials why would you rely on him as a source of information on climate science?
It isn’t a deflection. He probably knows more about it than you do. Anyway, he isn’t the source for info I use. I have told you about Dr. Ed Berry and all you can do is castigate the man in some fashion. You can’t refute his logic in showing how humans are not the primary factor in CO2 increases. Now come back with the usual garbage about all the science academies believing that humans do cause it. THAT does NOT satisfy the scientific method. If you can’t prove Dr. Berry is in error then you have NOTHING.
No, I have not castigated Ed Berry, only pointed out to you and other readers that his views on climate change are extreme…climate change is not his research area and he hasn’t published any peer-reviewed science since the 1980s as he freely admits on his website: There is ideology not science all over his website and his climate links are all well-known silly disinformation sites like the Heartland Institute, Cornwall Alliance and No Tricks Zone.
The ideology on his website doesn’t matter. He is an ATMOSPHERIC PHYSICIST. His expertise in the matter is greater than anyone you can name.
“Extreme”. That assessment is laughable. Just because he doesn’t align with the PC viewpoint it must be “extreme”. It is funny how you and all others can’t show him how he is wrong. Why is that?
Thanks for acknowledging that his website is indeed riddled with ideology not science.
Thanks for acknowledging that you can’t refute his theory. As I said, all you can do is castigate the man by criticizing his website.
You don’t have to be a farmer to know when you have a rotten egg. It is trivially simple to see the huge flaws in catastrophic global warming. See actual NOAA data on extreme weather. https://gonnasayit.com/extreme-weather-not/
Wow, amazing how a link to an amateurish blog developed by ‘bob’…can undermine decades of climate research. Very sophisticated analysis.
Ian5: Really! Apparently you are like a lot of climate religion’s adherents. You don’t understand the scientific aspects of anything, and all you can do is criticize the messenger. The data on my little web page is actual NOAA data, bought and paid by US taxpayers, and used by scientists everywhere. It shows that extreme weather events are not increasing, but they show NO TREND over the last several decades, or in case of hurricanes, over the last century. If you don’t understand something, and you don’t understand actual scientific data, then you don’t belong in a conversation where the subject deals with scientific subjects.
Bob, Your website is a mishmash of cherry-picked graphs interspersed with ideologically-based comments that do not in any way, shape or form summarize the current knowledge and understanding of climate change including the implications for extreme weather. It adds nothing helpful to a conversation about climate change.
Mishmash, maybe. Cherry-picked? You wouldn’t know the difference. The data on that page is THE discussion of extreme weather. The data has nothing to do with ideology. The data is THE data. It is the CURRENT knowledge of extreme weather but you don’t have the scientific chops to figure that out. That data is the conversation on extreme weather. Any other position is not scientific. I realize that I cannot change shallow-minded, uninformed people such as you.
“data is…data is…data has….that data” etc.
>> The word data is a plural noun. A common error of non-scientists.
Ian, is that the best response you can give? You are a poor advocate for AGW.
Just making an observation that the writer’s grammar is consistent with the quality of his website and his unnecessary snub about “[un]scientific,…shallow-minded, uninformed people”.
“…Marc Morano who has no climate science credentials…”
Yes just like Al Gore, Barak Obama and Bill Nye…
The article isn’t about Gore, Obama or Nye. Morano is the central figure in the story and makes a ridiculous claim despite having no climate science credentials whatsoever.
Try not to respond to this creep, “Ian5″…
You’ll notice he tries to dominate every such discussion, by asking for “explanations” of everyone. Just look through this one comments section – he’s everywhere, ignoring legitimate answers and denigrating every effective scientist, without evidence of what makes them “unacceptable”.