It was quite a shock to NJ Ayuk, even bigger to the Africa Energy Chamber, that the powers that be [the London-based Hyve group] decided to move the annual Africa Oil Week from Cape Town to Dubai. It was such a shock that the AEC shortly afterward announced it was sponsoring Africa Energy Week on the same weekend (November 8-12) as the (Out of) Africa Oil Week.
Africa Energy Chamber Executive Director NJ Ayuk, whose efforts to represent the interests of African companies and citizens in African energy ventures are widely recognized, calls the dueling conferences a major confrontation between “Cancel Fossil Fuels” (Dubai) and “Protect our Oil and Gas Industry” (Cape Town).
The Cancel Fossil Fuels movement is currently being led by the International Energy Agency, which recently declared that all oil and gas exploration must cease immediately in order to achieve compliance with the Paris climate accords (and save the world from the fires of hell).
The Biden-Harris Administration, the European Union, many Western banks, and now even Western insurance companies claim the world faces a “climate catastrophe” if we cling to fossil fuels. They are, of course, lying. There is no real “catastrophe” on the horizon. And they know it!
The hysteria in the press (here, here, here, and here, for example) is exceeded only by the hysterical screeching of Hollywood actors like Leonardo di Caprio and Don Cheadle. Newspaper reports tout compliance with Paris as a litmus test (one of many) for determining one’s humanity.
The hoopla has been so successful that fully a third of Americans, according to a recent Pew Research Center poll, now favor a full-on extinction of fossil fuels and engines that run on them. Only 64 percent of Americans prefer keeping fossil fuels in the energy mix. This in a nation with 270 million gasoline-powered vehicles on the road!
Hardly a day goes by without some entity virtue signaling disdain for fossil fuels. The media imply that “no fossil fuels by 2050” is “the future.” They are dead wrong. Litigation attorney Francis Menton hit the nail on the head in a recent real-world post: “The current legal onslaught is unlikely to limit world oil production significantly.”
Menton acknowledges the “multi-front legal onslaught” against the “major” oil producing companies (not countries!). The war is not confined to lawsuits; other weapons include new laws, regulatory initiatives, and proxy contests. But, as Menton demonstrates, the oft-targeted “major” Western oil companies (ExxonMobil, Chevron, Shell, BP, Conoco Phillips) “are just not that big a part of world production.”
ExxonMobil, the largest of the group, was ranked just sixth, and Chevron was the only other “major” in the top ten. The top five are Saudi Aramco, Rosneft (Russia), Kuwait Petroleum, National Iranian Oil Company, and China National. When is the last time you saw legal actions, major demonstrations, or even public demands that THOSE oil giants shut down?
Despite all the official kowtowing to Paris and even the IEA, the truth is that not even all Western nations have any real intention to decarbonize. Norway, for example, has openly stated its intention to increase its investments in offshore oil and gas operations in 2021.
Even so, the Norwegian government in an official statement promised to facilitate long-term economic growth in the petroleum industry “within the framework of our climate policy and our commitments under the Paris Agreement.” Huh?
The Norwegian Oil and Gas Association, however, bluntly stated its members do not share “the assumption that OPEC members alone should account for more than half of oil and gas production for the world market in a 2050 perspective.”
The reasons are obvious. First, the result would be very high energy prices and significant threats to global energy provision; second, Norway would lose revenues and jobs that support such industries as carbon capture and storage, hydrogen, and recovery of seabed minerals.
Africans like Ayuk share similar views – that their countries cannot afford to throw away their best chances for economic growth, full employment, and infrastructure development to satisfy the whims of wealthy Europeans. Here are a few reasons.
Canada-based Reconnaissance Energy Africa is on the verge of turning the Namibian paart of the Kavango Basin into a world oil capital. Exploratory drilling within the 8.5-million-acre Kavango Basin has confirmed that “Namibia is endowed with an active onshore petroleum basin,” according to Hon. Tom Alweendo, the nation’s minister of mines and energy. Namibia hopes that oil and gas development will lead to economic stimulus, increased infrastructure potable water access, and investments in environmental and wildlife conservation.
Just last year the Russian firm Rosgeo signed an agreement with Equatorial Guinea for an historic geological mapping project – the first step toward developing a domestic oil and gas industry and uncovering other mineral resources. [Equatorial Guinea has withdrawn from Africa Oil Week in favor of Africa Energy Week.]
An earlier report identified 70 crude oil and natural gas projects planned for startup in sub-Saharan Africa between 2019 and 2025, and that Nigeria by 2025 would be producing over a million barrels of oil per day (BOPD). Two of Africa’s five largest oil and gas projects are in Mozambique: the state-of-the-art Mozambique LNG facility, which plans to tap into an estimated 75 trillion cubic feet (tcf) of recoverable offshore natural gas, and the 85-tcf Area 4 project, which includes the Coral (floating) and Rovuma LNG facilities.
BP just awarded a billion-dollar contract for construction of phase 1 of the 15-tcf Tortue Ahmeyim offshore LNG project, which benefits Mauritania and Senegal. Shell is planning to begin construction in 2022 of a $30 billion LNG liquefaction plant in Tanzania, which has over 57 tcf of recoverable natural gas reserves. And the East African Crude Oil Pipeline intends to transport crude oil from Kabaale-Hoima in Uganda to the Tanzanian port of Tanga.
None of these energy-rich African nations is eager to submit to the demands of the IEA, which envisions only existing OPEC nations as future producers and refiners. And this, it appears, is the dividing line between Africa Oil Week and the new Africa Energy Week.
A leading theme of Africa Oil Week in Dubai is “Africa’s energy transition efforts towards a cleaner environment.” The Dubai event asks, “As the pressure mounts for regions, countries, and companies to meet the Paris Agreement targets on eliminating carbon emissions, where does the continent stand?” [Resistance. Is. Futile.]
Africa Energy Week, which has already garnered an impressive list of speakers, sponsors, and attendees, has a much different theme – and no lack of chutzpah. “Replacing Africa Oil Week,” the creators state their event “seeks to unite industry stakeholders, international speakers, and movers and shakers from the African oil and gas sector … to define and promote the African energy agenda through development, deal-making, and private sector participation.”
Key topics at Africa Energy Week include making energy poverty history before 2030, the future of the African oil and gas industry, the role of women in energy, and discussions of opportunities and financial challenges. The AEC says this lone Africa-focused, in-person energy event is fully focused on promoting African development and growth through African-held events.
Ayuk says that the AOW’s move to Dubai provided an opportunity for Africans to stand up for African values. “We are going to fight for our future. We are not going to give it to this crowd. I am not worried about the attacks. We are going to stand for what is right.”