Why does no one in the mainstream media ask the hard questions of these people? Why do they not vet not only their extreme claims, but what they have said in the past?
Al Gore: His idea that Net 0 would mean warming would stop is absurd. You can’t say its a lie, because it is a future event, but what possible proof does he have of that? I can say the sun is coming up tomorrow and back it up with the idea of persistence and science. Or water will freeze at 32. But from the man who can’t understand (along with, it seems like, all these people) that if the Arctic is not warming in the summer and the mean summer temp is not far from 32, the ice cap not only won’t melt but can’t, is yet another example of his utter ignorance. It is breathtaking
John Kerry is going after our food supply. Kerry wants to wreck farming because it contributes to greenhouse gases and warming. Let me get this straight. Of the .042%of the atmosphere that is CO2, man has contributed about 5%. Of that 5%, agriculture is a tiny fraction perhaps 10%. Now let us take a country like Denmark, where farmers may be forced to shut down farming. What does Denmark contribute to the planet’s CO2?. SO LITTLE IT APPROACHES ZERO. Yet Starving people and sending food prices through the roof is fine with Kerry. No wonder he got a D in Geology.
Then we have Bill Gates, who says planting trees won’t help. Since many countries are already Carbon negative because they have enough trees to offset emissions, apparently Mr Gates does not understand that trees get rid of 50 lbs of CO2 each.
Let’s do the math.
A new Yale-led study estimates that there are more than 3 trillion trees on Earth, about seven and a half times more than some previous estimates.
That means about 150 trillion pounds of CO2 is gobbled up.
Humans produce 36.3 gigatons of CO2.
36.3 trillion gigatons is only 80 trillion pounds. Of course, the rest of the planet is emitting more CO2. But the point is that of course, a global marshal plan of planting trees (let us say another trillion) with Nuclear power and point of combustion Carbon capture would solve this problem much more economically. Not that it is a problem as more CO2 is better. But if it was, there is a much easier fix. Just simply adapt and move on.
But my point is how does Gates get off on saying planting trees won’t help? Heck, he is for chopping them down and replacing them with God knows what. And people buy into it and just smile and nod. He claims global warming will lead to crop disasters, directly opposite of what is going on. We have never produced more food globally. Wait a minute I thought John Kerry wants to get rid of farming. Can these people please get their stories straight?
Then there is Kerry’s daughter, Vanessa Kerry, whom near as I can tell, has no reason to be in any position of authority except John has likely left her in charge of spreading the same kind of D in Geology nonsense he has been spreading for the past few decades.
Look at this pearl of wisdom from her.
“2023 was an apocalyptic year in terms of extreme weather events. That is about to get worse.”
What the heck is she talking about?
This is from Dr Roger Piellke jr ( who believes CO2 does have a warming effect, but is demonized for telling the truth about the results).
The IPCC has concluded that a signal of climate change has not yet emerged beyond natural variability for the following phenomena:
- River floods
- Heavy precipitation and pluvial floods
- Landslides
- Drought (all types)
- Severe wind storms
- Tropical cyclones
- Sand and dust storms
- Heavy snowfall and ice storms
- Hail
- Snow avalanche
- Coastal flooding
- Marine heat waves
So she makes it up. Like father, like daughter.
Then there is Hillary Clinton, whom I owe a great deal to, since HRC labeled a cat 1 hurricane that took 11 days to develop at the height of the hurricane season in 2016, a sign of the impending global warming doom. I coined the term weaponization of the weather from that incident. My first book had a chapter, then a whole book based around it.
Now look at this tweet:
First of all, the tonnage is falling and has been. Second, the faster you make them fall by way of the tyranny she is advocating to do this, the more the nation plunges into the abyss. Third, So what? Why is she insisting on economic suicide when she had a chance to stand up to China; and Biden and the rest of the ilk above do not stand up to China? Biden took it one step further. He had his son make a deal with a Chinese fossil fuel company that benefitted his family personally — along with the company and China — while continuing to advocate policies that make his own country weaker. Which of course would please the foreign adversary even more. But it figures HRC would not think about that, given the Clintons known grifting.
What I don’t get is how no one, (not even the conservative media or neutral ones like Fox has become) don’t call these people out. It has to be because they are afraid they will be destroyed. They can’t be that ignorant. They will back up a story even though they know it not to be true. Look at the recent revelation from Andrew Cuomo that the vax did cause him problems. Yet it took til the data came out for him to say anything; data that was there but anyone bringing it up was isolated, demonized, and destroyed in the best Alinsky-like tactics. But again, the linkage to climate, or Hunter Biden, or Hamas, or BLM or whatever is all there and the common denominator is people that push it, get away with it. That linkage is a campaign of deception, distortion, and delusion. The fibbing 5 above regularly push and no one will call them out on it.
A country built on the freedom to confront cold hard facts can not survive when shackled by the deception that we are dealing with today. The link is clear and climate will be the nail in the coffin of the foundational freedoms of our country. These 5 are part of a network that has nothing but evil intent for the progress and good of mankind as their motivation.