I feel qualified to make the observation I am making, which is yet another parallel on COVID and climate. One of my books, “The Weaponization of Weather in the Phony Climate War,” was written in the dark early days of COVID, in April 2020. Yet, there were two chapters in the book (it came out in September 2020) that were drawing attention to the situation with COVID and climate:

Chapter 10: COVID-19/Climate-Change Alliance Weaponization
Chapter 11: The False Equivalency Between Climate Change & COVID-19

I have always felt that the whole issue of climate is the left’s final nail in the coffin of the foundational values of our nation. COVID demonstrated that people would not only give up their freedoms but would demonize those who would not. That fact that it was so easy to get people to obey like mindless sheep and rage at anyone who did not follow suit was astounding. It shows what people will do to save themselves and the planet, without questioning authority. The entire man-made climate agenda ends with forced restrictions of freedom and a top-down control structure, the same as Fauci and his ilk practiced.

So, the Faucis of climate are waiting. You can list your own names, but they know that the current administration is a speed bump in the road to their ultimate goal. They are watching major media outlets not distribute the details of what actually happened with Fauci, and they know they will have no accountability. And they know how to fight; it’s easy. Pick out any extreme event and blame climate change, with no exposure of all the other factors that are out there that can contribute to what you are seeing. And they will either lie or simply put something out they have no deep knowledge about, and it’s off to the races.

But they do not want to believe anything that could possibly put their beliefs to a test. It’s a classic case of what you attach value to or the eyes of the world or the eyes of God. Fauci’s known comments on that explain perfectly well why he is the way he is at this stage of his life.

It’s the same thing in climate as you saw with Fauci. Trust the science. If you attack me, you attack the science. Even though the very nature of science is it has to be attacked to advance. Heck, it’s spiritual. Oswald Chambers says it this way: “Seeing is never believing; we interpret what we see in the light of what we believe.” But they did not want to believe anything that could possibly make them see something differently. It’s a classic case of what do you attach value to: the eyes of the world or the eyes of God. If you do not have the eyes to search what you can’t see, then you are concerned about self and the world’s opinion. The very nature of the search for truth is that it must be tried. Fauci, and the climate Faucis out there, want nothing to do with that. Their actions speak louder than my words on this matter, as their actions are proof.

COVID would have eventually gone away with or without the vax. The idea that you had to obey and should not question runs hand in hand with what the Faucis of climate have been pushing. In fact, one can argue that Fauci saw that a guy like Al Gore could get away with his jibberish and was emboldened by it. There would be no consequences.

And attribution distortion was huge in COVID, and it is in climate. If you died and had COVID, no matter what other condition you had, it was listed as a COVID death. Any person that got the shot and survived was a plus for the shot. Any negatives were dismissed, almost as the large natural forcings that may be responsible for much of the current trend in the climate are dismissed. Natural immunity always has carried a great weight. Yet it was dismissed here. Same as the large natural forcings have always carried the greatest weight in climate, but they do not now. It’s a self-sustaining idea now. But the main goal is the same. The control of many by the elite few. This has always been a problem that has limited the true advance of men: A few men subjugate the many and prevent the individual from succeeding apart from everyone, as it would expose their entire agenda that is focused on everyone marching to the same tune

The calls for locking up “climate deniers” is similar to what we saw with COVID

Some notable examples

  • Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (around 2014): He stated that politicians who deny climate change “are contemptible human beings and I wish there were a law you could punish them under,” and related commentary framed it as calls involving jailing climate deniers (he later emphasized free speech more strongly). That was amazing in that what he looks at with his agenda is no different than what many of us look at in what we do. I would love to get in front of him and show him the parallels. Interestingly enough, we both train like maniacs with weights and are obsessive about nutrition. I have not taken TRT or anything like that, but I do think our minds probably think alike about what we focus on. That comment above is a natural extension of the top-down attitude that RFK Jr. seems to have had second thoughts on. He was willing to do to skeptics the same kind of things that people are after him for now. I wonder if he ever thinks about that linkage.
  • Bill Nye (2016 interview): He expressed openness to criminal charges or investigations that could involve jail time for certain climate-related dissent or “extreme doubt,” noting a “chilling effect” on skeptics as potentially positive, while discussions centered more on industry accountability than ordinary speech.
  • Group of scientists (2015): Around 20 climate scientists wrote to President Obama urging investigation of “deniers” (focused on fossil fuel industry and related groups) under RICO racketeering statutes, modeled on tobacco litigation — this was about prosecution for alleged organized deception rather than pure opinion.
  • NON-DEGREE meteorologist Jim Dale (2024 and related appearances): He has publicly argued that climate change deniers should be “criminalized,” particularly regarding promotion of denial in the public domain.
  • Eric Idle (recent, around 2026 wildfire context): The Monty Python member suggested locking up climate change deniers amid extreme weather discussions.

The same thing went on in COVID.

What is most hideous is that people lost so much because of people who would not allow debate. Lives lost because you could not get alternative treatments, no matter how slim a chance, in the eyes of the people making the rules. The limiting of freedoms, the suppression of the human spirit to advance, the anxiety caused not only by the disease itself, but by the actions taken against society as a whole, supposedly to save society. Some lost everything, from their lives to their way of making a living. And the few simply were not allowed to be challenged

The same thing is going on in climate.

What I don’t get is how some of the people who have pushed what they have pushed, been proven wrong on a multitude of stances, just continue on as if nothing happened. And then do the same thing again. Jimmy Carter talked about a fundamental malaise in the American people. You can read the speech here: https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/address-the-nation-energy-and-national-goals-the-malaise-speech

Yet he, like many of the people in COVID and climate are the reason for the problem; they cause the problem in the first place. Their very actions shut down the chance for the individual to be as free as possible to advance. And they seek solutions that will only make the problem they caused in the first place worse, all because of a belief that men have to be manipulated for the good of society, and challenge is unacceptable.

I wrote this a while ago.

https://www.cfact.org/2026/06/02/climate-exaggerators-wont-go-away/

Perhaps we should change it to the Climate Faucis.