Life in fossil-fuel-free utopia

By |2017-08-16T17:09:48+00:00August 13th, 2017|CFACT Insights|8 Comments

Al Gore’s new movie, a New York Times article on the final Obama Era “manmade climate disaster” report, and a piece saying wrathful people 12 years from now will hang hundreds of “climate deniers” are a tiny sample of Climate Hysteria and Anti-Trump Resistance rising to a crescendo. If we don’t end our evil fossil-fuel-burning lifestyles and go 100% renewable Right Now, we are doomed, they rail.

Maybe it’s our educational system, our cargo cult’s easy access to food and technology far from farms, mines, and factories, or the end-of-days propaganda constantly pounded into our heads. Whatever the reason, far too many people have a pitiful grasp of reality: natural climate fluctuations throughout Earth history; the intricate, often fragile sources of things we take for granted; and what life would really be like in the utopian fossil-fuel-free future they dream of. Let’s take a short journey into that idyllic realm.

Suppose we generate just the 25 billion megawatt-hours (MWh) of today’s total global electricity consumption using wind turbines. (That’s not total energy consumption, and it doesn’t include what we’d need to charge a billion electric vehicles.) We’d need more than 830 million gigantic 3-MW turbines!

Spacing them at just 15 acres per turbine would require 12.5 billion acres! That’s twice the land area of North America! All those whirling blades would virtually exterminate raptors, other birds, and bats. Rodent and insect populations would soar. Add in transmission lines, solar panels, and biofuel plantations to meet the rest of the world’s energy demands – and the mostly illegal tree cutting for firewood to heat poor families’ homes – and huge swaths of our remaining forest and grassland habitats would disappear.

The renewable future assumes these “eco-friendly alternatives” would provide reliable, affordable energy 24/7/365, even during windless, sunless weeks and cold, dry growing seasons. They never will, of course. That means we will have electricity and fuels when nature cooperates, instead of when we need it.

With backup power plants gone, constantly on-and-off electricity will make it impossible to operate assembly lines, use the internet, do an MRI or surgery, enjoy favorite TV shows, or even cook dinner. Refrigerators and freezers would conk out for hours or days at a time. Medicines and foods would spoil.

Petrochemical feed stocks would be gone – so we wouldn’t have paints, plastics, synthetic fibers, or pharmaceuticals, except what can be obtained at great expense from weather-dependent biodiesel. Kiss your cotton-polyester-lycra leggings and yoga pants good-bye.

But of course all that is really not likely to happen. It would actually be far worse.

First of all, there wouldn’t even be any wind turbines or solar panels. Without fossil fuels – or far more nuclear and hydroelectric plants, which rabid environmentalists also despise – we couldn’t mine the needed ores, process and smelt them, build and operate foundries, factories, refineries, or cement kilns, or manufacture and assemble turbines and panels. We couldn’t even make machinery to put in factories.

Wind turbines, solar panels, and solar thermal installations cannot produce consistently high enough heat to smelt ores and forge metals. They cannot generate power on a reliable enough basis to operate facilities that make modern technologies possible. They cannot provide the power required to manufacture turbines, panels, batteries or transmission lines – much less power civilization.

My grandmother used to tell me, “The only good thing about the good old days is that they’re gone.” Well, they’d be back, as the USA is de-carbonized, de-industrialized, and de-developed.

Ponder America and Europe before coal fueled the modern industrial age. Recall what we were able to do back then, what lives were like, how long people lived. Visit Colonial Williamsburg and Claude Moore Colonial Farm in Virginia, or similar places in your state. Explore rural Africa and India.

Imagine living that way, every day: pulling water from wells, working the fields with your hoe and ox-pulled plow, spinning cotton thread and weaving on looms, relying on whatever metal tools your local blacksmith shop can produce. When the sun goes down, your lives will largely shut down.

Think back to amazing construction projects of ancient Egypt, Greece, or Rome – or even 18th century London, Paris, or New York. Ponder how they were built, how many people it took, how they obtained and moved the raw materials. Imagine being part of those wondrous enterprises, from sunup to sundown.

The good news is that there will be millions of new jobs. The bad news is that they’d involve mostly backbreaking labor with picks and shovels, for a buck an hour. Low-skill, low-productivity jobs just don’t pay all that well. Maybe to create even more jobs, the government will issue spoons, instead of shovels.

That will be your life, not reading, watching TV and YouTube, or playing video games. Heck, there won’t even be any televisions or cell phones. Drugs and alcohol will be much harder to come by, too. (No more opioid crisis.) Water wheels and wind mills will be back in fashion. All-natural power, not all the time.

There’ll be no paved streets – unless armies of low-skill workers pound rocks into gravel, mine and grind limestone, shale, bauxite, and sand for cement, and make charcoal for lime kilns. Homes will revert to what can be built with preindustrial technologies, with no central heat and definitely no AC.

Ah, but you folks promoting the idyllic renewable energy future will still be the ruling elites. You’ll get to live better than the rest of us, enjoy lives of reading and leisure, telling us commoners how we must live. Don’t bet on it. Don’t even bet on having the stamina to read after a long day with your shovel or spoon.

As society and especially big urban areas collapse into chaos, it will be survival of the fittest. And that group likely won’t include too many Handgun Control and Gun Free Zone devotees.

But at least your climate will be stable and serene – or so you suppose. You won’t have any more extreme weather events. Sea levels will stay right where they are today: 400 feet higher than when a warming planet melted the last mile-thick glaciers that covered half the Northern Hemisphere 12,000 years ago.

At least it will be stable and serene until those solar, cosmic ray, ocean currents, and other pesky, powerful natural forces decide to mess around with Planet Earth again.

Of course, many countries won’t be as stupid as the self-righteous utopian nations. They will still use fossil fuels, plus nuclear and hydroelectric, and watch while you roll backward toward the “good old days.” Those that don’t swoop in to conquer and plunder may even send us food, clothing, and monetary aid (most of which will end up with ruling elites and their families, friends, cronies, and private armies).

So how about this as a better option?

Stop obsessing over “dangerous manmade climate change.” Focus on what really threatens our planet and its people: North Korea, Iran, Islamist terrorism – and rampant poverty, disease, malnutrition, and early death among the billions who still do not have access to electricity and the living standards it brings.

Worry less about manmade climate cataclysms – and more about cataclysms caused by policies promoted in the name of controlling Earth’s climate, when they really end up controlling our lives.

Don’t force-feed us with today’s substandard, subsidized, pseudo-sustainable, pseudo-renewable energy systems. When better, more efficient, more practical energy technologies are developed, they will replace fossil fuels. Until then, we would be crazy to go down the primrose path to renewable energy utopia.


  1. Brin Jenkins August 14, 2017 at 11:43 AM

    The delusion of those who imagine themselves superior! All bets are off if we see a collapse and it can happen very quickly when hunger strikes a deprived population.

  2. ONTIME August 18, 2017 at 11:52 AM

    The obstructions and the insanity by the enviro whackos and the left are astounding, they are nothing more than socialist criminals wanting to have a agrarian society where quality of life has been reduced to near stone age thinking and the feudal systems prevails….We want and need newer and better ways to utilize energy and develop new means of production in a safe and sane manner for reliability…The world is not going to wait on us and we are losing ground if we sit on our laurels……ENERGY…MAGA…AMERICA FOR AMERICANS….

  3. J T August 18, 2017 at 12:41 PM

    Do you suppose even brain-dead Dano understands now? I doubt it.

    • Immortal600 August 19, 2017 at 8:36 PM

      I wonder if Dan even lurks here any more. Since his real identity became known he has disappeared. I for one don’t miss his condescending posts. As if he really understood climate dynamics. He had himself fooled as do all the other AGW believers. But, but, but “all the world’s scientific academies believe it !” Like that must make it true. Amazing!

  4. prometheus11 August 18, 2017 at 7:37 PM

    As the report makes clear, Civilization has benefitted from the fruits of human discovery of scientific principal, particularly so, over the last two centuries. Why? Because the American revolution overthrew British Imperial subjugation and with it, British Free Trade!! We owe it to Alexander Hamilton for designing a federal system of political economy that relied on human invention and ingenuity. For the genius in Hamilton recognized those two human assets as the substance from which all wealth sprang forth. British Free Trade on the other hand relied on available supplies of cheap labor and the sea lanes that it controlled. And as the song goes, the British Empire ruled the waves. Controlled nuclear reactions are the result of man’s discoveries, even though it was driven by the intentions of some to use it against man. Fortunately for civilization, saner heads have prevailed in government after Truman. In this case, commercial nuclear power was the result of a natural discovery in a line of discoveries, by scientist and researchers, who were reaching for higher and higher energy-flux-density systems. Energy systems that serve to revolutionize production processes of an entire economic spectrum. It began with discovery of principal of the Heat Powered Machine doing the work of a hundred men. This discovery is owing to men such as Hygens and Leibnitz. Then electricity was harnessed in what history calls the industrial revolution but which should be looked at as the results of the 1876 Philadelphia World’s Fair. It was here that great inventions were on display. Giant Turbines that could be used to power industries and even cities were marveled at by representatives from as far away as Japan, Germany, Poland, and Hungary. Nations thirsting for industrial progress sent representatives. But because of the discovery and harnessing of electricity and it’s assimilation in society, it changed the scale on which manufacturing and fabrication were done. Industrial and agricultural production soared in America. But not only in America. Japan, Germany, Poland and Hungary realized the benefits of introducing what Hamilton called “In the usual progress of things, the necessities of a nation in every stage of its existence will be found at least equal to its resources.” And the limits of a nation’s resources are to be measured only by the limits of ingenuity and human creativity place on it by shortsighted leaders or Empires. Harnessing commercial fusion must become the next mission of this government, in a crash program the which has not been seen since the Apollo space mission.

  5. PW August 22, 2017 at 11:49 AM

    This article had to be embarrassing to write…. There are many more green energy sources than wind turbines…. Everyone who wants green energy understands that there is an initial investment necessary that would come from fossil fuel generated products. No one is saying that we can’t use natural gas to refine and smelt metal, ridiculous argument. There are constant new innovations in energy storage, many are up to 80% efficient without using batteries, so your argument of spotty energy is preposterous. Are you actively trying to confuse your readers? Or, are you deluded yourself?

    • ninetyninepct September 25, 2017 at 2:08 AM

      I have looked and can’t find the no battery 80% information. Any idea where?

  6. ninetyninepct September 25, 2017 at 2:06 AM

    Those of us who have armed ourselves will simply go and take what we need and want from the environmental jihadist Climate Barbies of the world. A few weapons and a lot of ammunition increase my chances of surviving for an extended time. Sorry Justin, sorry Soros, sorry Gore, sorry climate barbie, you lose.

Comments are closed.