As has become the usual practice at the UN climate summits, COP 19 in Warsaw has gone past its Friday closing time and is now in overtime.
This year’s talks became bogged down by a series of challenges.
Russia raised fundamental issues of procedural fairness — little things like the UN not recognizing nations seeking to speak or permitting them to vote.
132 poor nations walked out to pressure industrialized nations to accept legal liability for “loss and damage” they suffer as a result of natural disasters. That science cannot show a meaningful causal relationship between natural disasters occurring today and global warming is an afterthought — or no thought at all.
In a truly bizarre twist, hundreds of members of far-left enviro NGOs walked out of the talks to express their frustration when the UNFCCC did not immediately cave in to their demands and fund loss and damage and a host of other redistribution schemes. They also found sponsorship of the COP by charitable gifts from industry and the presence of business representatives in the proceedings to be intolerable — that they themselves are tolerated in the proceedings under the same rules is quite conveniently beyond their ken.
All that Sturm und Drang left the climate talks way behind schedule.
Negotiators did emerge from behind closed doors to announce that they had an agreement in hand to finalize the UN’s REDD scheme. If you’ve been dreaming of becoming a billionaire by selling carbon offsets from third world forests that will have no meaningful effect on world temperatures, your moment has come.
With most negotiating tracks way behind schedule, the Obama administration tried to ride to the rescue. U.S. Special Envoy for Climate Change Todd Stern announced that for the first time the U.S. now supports all nations declaring their targets for reducing CO2 emissions before 2015. This would clear the path for the UN to adopt a full climate treaty and successor to the Kyoto Protocol in Paris in 2015, while Obama is still in office.
E.U. climate chief Connie Hedegaard has been trying to get the U.S. on board for years. Stern’s announcement gave her something with which to encourage the delegates that their climate treaty of Paris remains in sight. -However, major stumbling blocks remain. Developing nations remain simultaneously reluctant to reduce their own emissions and adamant that they want immediate funding for both the Green Climate Fund and Loss and Damage.
As the talks enter their final hours, how big a bribe can Hedegaard and the industrial world come up with to get developing nations to agree to a COP 19 outcome? Alternatively, will developing nations defer their global warming distribution dreams to at last have the U.S. on board?
Whose money after all do you think it is that they are so eager to redistribute?
Here is the crux of this scam by the UN. Why do you have to pay for reducing greenhouse gases? If you truly are hell bent on reduction, then simply ruled the reductions be met. Period. This is nothing more than a scam to get the developed world to give more money to the UN in the range of $15, B per year, keep $12,B and distribute $3, B. Wake up Canada, US, Europe and Russia. The increase in greenhouse gases is not the result of more commercial developed nations, but to the direct increase in undeveloped nation population explosion and they want us to pay for them. Have some birth control first and then maybe I would think about contributing to the cause monetarily. Stop looking for reasons to rape the civilized world and give to the bankster of the world, Rothschilds, Windsors, Bushes, Rockefellers and the ilk. If you are so hell bent on giving your money away, UN, I will gladly take some from you. When was the last independant audit? How do we know where you spend your money. The world does not know. Name me one program that the UN has started that has been successful on its own merits. I know the US does not have a record of successful programs that have worked. Know why not? All the trails lead to somebody making a ton of money form the program. Ultimately the large banks and corporations have raped the SUA of its legacy and it has to stop. We have not had one reason to continue sending our money to Washington and I say it is about time to stop it all and return Washington back to the people. I dare you to prove me wrong and have physical proof of the rebuttal. Good Luck.
obama has made another lame decision by siding with the U.N. and continues to dismantle America!!!!! The U.N. can’t manage itself and the majority of the Third World Nations at the U.N. do not like the United States of America!!!!! Let them hate us for free!!!!!
When are those dip-squats in the Congress going to impeach this guy? When there is nothing left? He has taken numerous unilateral unconstitutional actions in the last few years that he could be impeached for. Even National Black Republicans Association has filed articles of impeachment against him. How long is America going to continue to be “black” mailed by the civil rights movement.
I believe Obama is sick of being blamed for everything so he will kiss up and continue to use the U.N as his tool to destroy the economy and security of the U.S . Impeach him and get this madness over with.
Yet another scheme to steal money from the American taxpayers, and reduce the American standard of living.
Not minimizing the blatant lie and scam of “climate change”, if all of these obliviating fools (eco terrorists) would stay home instead of flying to all these “summits”, traveling in their limos/cabs, and staying in expensive hotels….and just SHUT UP, just think of how much CO2 we could eliminate!
While we are at it, shut up 90% of DC and send them home for one last time….just think of how the planet will benefit!
He is just taking his “revenge vote” to another level….
When are these climate change charlatans going to get the message? The game is up!
Catastrophic man-made global warming is a complete con!
I totally agree with Walt Cunningham that Mann-made global warming does not exist. Here is the first part of an experiment that shows that the Hypotheses of Greenhouse gas effect has been proven wrong.
Albert
Einstein once said, “No
amount of experimentation can ever prove me right; a single
experiment can prove me wrong.”
Einstein’s words express a foundational principle of science
intoned by the logician, Karl Popper: Falsifiability. In order to
verify a hypothesis there must be a test by which it can be proved
false. A thousand observations may appear to verify a hypothesis, but
one critical failure could result in its demise. The history of
science is littered with such examples.
The
Experiment that Failed which can save the World Trillions:
Proving the “greenhouse gas effect”
does not exist!
By Berthold Klein P.E (January 15, 2012)
Edited by John O’Sullivan,
incorporating comments by Dr. Pierre Latour, Professor Nasif Nahle,
Edward J. Haddad Jr. P.E, Ganesh Krish, and others.
Dedication
To Professor Robert W. Wood (1909), the
first scientist to demonstrate that the Hypothesis of the “Greenhouse
effect in the atmosphere” was unscientific. To all other scientists
since Professor Wood who have added sound technical and scientific
knowledge in many related fields to strengthen the case against the
greenhouse gas effect hoax.
To protect my grandsons JJ and BA plus
their generation and all the generations that follow – because we
finally got it right. For the generations that would otherwise suffer
extreme economic harm if the Hoax of (Michael) Mann-made global
warming – AKA the “greenhouse gas effect” (GHGE) is not stopped
now and forever.
Table of Contents:
Preamble
Section 1: The Hypotheses
Section 2: The Definitions – The Clues
Section 3: The Experiment
Section 4: Numbers
Section 5: Holding the gases –
“containment”
Section 6: Setting up the Experiment
Section 7: Results: Examining the Clues
Section 8: Water – liquid, vapor, solid (H2O /lvs)
References
Appendix
Preamble:
This paper endeavors to solve a
188-year-old mystery that has eluded many scientists. It merely takes
a cogent, specialist application of science that has been in the
books of physics and thermodynamics for over 100 years. To solve the
mystery of why “The greenhouse gas effect (GHGE)” does not exist,
one certainly has to have an understanding of quantum physics and the
basic laws of conservation of energy. To most people, including many
scientists, quantum physics is a mystery especially because many
things that occur are not intuitive. When explained and proven by
experiments, it can be understood. As with any mystery; what are the
real clues and what are the red herrings?
It is desirable that anyone that can
read be able to understand the experiment documented herein and what
it means. This paper is for everyone – from the man on the street
who would suffer the most by government “1984 Big Brother”
control to the Ph. D. holders in social sciences, finance and
otherwise unrelated branches of science, law and politics.
At the outset, having communicated with
real people and some Ph. D’s, I realized that my mission appeared
to be a veritable “Mission Impossible”. Being able to read does
not mean that the reader can comprehend the inner workings of
science. While having a Ph. D. in one field does not give someone
sound knowledge or judgment in unrelated fields (although many are
increasingly taking the time to study in other areas to accumulate
the knowledge needed). Each person may possess an area of expertise
but only a few can extend this knowledge to analyze clues within
totally unfamiliar mysteries.
We need to start with a very brief
definition of the greenhouse gas effect (GHGE) – an effect where
certain gases have the molecular composition to absorb Infrared
(heat) radiation – and what happens afterward is important because it
is not intuitive but is proven by basic physics. The Bohr model shows
this millions of times each day by our use of Infrared heaters in
homes, restaurants (food warmers), factories, bus stops, etc. This
process of absorbing Infrared radiation (IR) is supposed to cause the
earth to be warmer than a planet without carbon dioxide (CO2), or any
other atmosphere. Yet here is just one example of a recent paper that
gives us insight into the real causes of “climate change”:_
hyperlink
“http://notrickszone.com/2011/12/30/the-suns-impact-on-earths-temperature-goes-far-beyond-tsi-new-paper-shows/”__The
Sun’s Impact On Earth’s Temperature Goes Far Beyond TSI – New
Paper Shows_
By _ HYPERLINK
“http://notrickszone.com/author/admin/”__P
Gosselin_ on 30th
December 2011 (TSI=total solar irradiance)
There are several words or terms used in
this paper that need some explanation; a Glossary of terms is
provided within the Appendix.
Section 1:
The Hypotheses:
To demonstrate the existence of
“greenhouse gas effect (GHGE) it is necessary to define it. We are
told the Hypotheses of the “greenhouse gas effect” is the process
involving a combination of “Infra-red absorbing gases” (IRag),
including Water/liquid/vapor/solid (H2O/lvs), CO2, CH4, NO2 and
others are super insulation which cause the atmosphere to be 33
degrees C warmer than would be explained by the “black body
temperature” (a theoretical perfect radiator of electomagnetic
energy).” -The earth along with its atmosphere is not one of them.
This is just the tip of the iceberg of
the magic caused by the “greenhouse gas effect” as has been said
the truth is in the details. Regarding this see the Commentary by
Professor Nahle and Dr. Latour
To begin to define “The
greenhouse gas effect” let’s start with the “features that
should be testable.” Because water/liquid, vapor, solid (H2O /lvs)
physically reacts differently than other IRag gases
such as carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrogen dioxide (NO2)
these IRag gases will be dealt with first.
Section 2: The
Definitions – The Clues
Here are those critical features claimed
(yet unproved) in the Standard Model “greenhouse gas effect”:
Infrared absorbing gases (IRag)
absorb IR radiation and thus they inhibit such radiation from
escaping into space, thereby reducing the rate of atmospheric
cooling i.e. causing air to be warmer.
IRag’s will “back radiate” IR
radiation to earth causing increased heating of the surface.
IRag’s will heat up by the
absorption of the IR radiation thus heating the air. (Oxygen,
Nitrogen, Water vapor and trace gases).
IRag’s have different levels of
“back-forcing”. Thus CH4 (methane) is supposed to deliver 23 to
70 times more “back radiation “ than CO2. NO2 delivers 289 times
that of CO2. (Alarmist ‘experts’ have yet to explain these
numbers). Evidently, it is assumed that someone quantified the
amount of IR that a particular sample of gas absorbs utilizing IR
spectrophotometer analysis and then compared this data to the
absorption of CO2. This is a very important feature of the “GHGE”
The higher the concentration of
IRag’s the greater the amount of “back-radiation” and the
higher the temperature of the earth which in turn results in an
increase in the global atmospheric temperature.
The concentration of CO2 found in
million-year-old ice cores can be utilized as proof that the “GHGE”
exists.
Where
does this standard model greenhouse gas effect lead?
We all know that there is one true kind
of “greenhouse” effect. Engineers have built real greenhouses
for decades for a useful purpose (growing plants). Anyone that has
gotten into a hot car on a sunny day (either in summer or winter),
experiences this. We see temperatures that are much higher in the car
than in the shade. This is caused by confined space heating. This was
established in 1909 by R.W. Wood a professor of Physics and Optics at
John Hopkins University from 1901 to 1955 an expert in IR and UV
radiation. Professor Nasif Nahle famously confirmed Professor Wood’s
worth in 2011.
So what experiment could be performed to
“prove” that the “greenhouse gas effect exists?
I totally agree with Walt Cunningham that Mann-made global warming does not exist. Here is the first part of an experiment that shows that the Hypotheses of Greenhouse gas effect has been proven wrong.
Albert
Einstein once said, “No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right; a single experiment can prove me wrong.”
Einstein’s words express a foundational principle of science
intoned by the logician, Karl Popper: Falsifiability. In order to
verify a hypothesis there must be a test by which it can be proved
false. A thousand observations may appear to verify a hypothesis, but
one critical failure could result in its demise. The history of
science is littered with such examples.
The
Experiment that Failed which can save the World Trillions:
Proving the “greenhouse gas effect”
does not exist!
By Berthold Klein P.E (January 15, 2012)
Edited by John O’Sullivan,
incorporating comments by Dr. Pierre Latour, Professor Nasif Nahle,
Edward J. Haddad Jr. P.E, Ganesh Krish, and others.
Dedication
To Professor Robert W. Wood (1909), the
first scientist to demonstrate that the Hypothesis of the “Greenhouse
effect in the atmosphere” was unscientific. To all other scientists
since Professor Wood who have added sound technical and scientific
knowledge in many related fields to strengthen the case against the
greenhouse gas effect hoax.
To protect my grandsons JJ and BA plus
their generation and all the generations that follow – because we
finally got it right. For the generations that would otherwise suffer
extreme economic harm if the Hoax of (Michael) Mann-made global
warming – AKA the “greenhouse gas effect” (GHGE) is not stopped
now and forever.
Table of Contents:
Preamble
Section 1: The Hypotheses
Section 2: The Definitions – The Clues
Section 3: The Experiment
Section 4: Numbers
Section 5: Holding the gases –
“containment”
Section 6: Setting up the Experiment
Section 7: Results: Examining the Clues
Section 8: Water – liquid, vapor, solid (H2O /lvs)
References
Appendix
Preamble:
This paper endeavors to solve a
188-year-old mystery that has eluded many scientists. It merely takes
a cogent, specialist application of science that has been in the
books of physics and thermodynamics for over 100 years. To solve the
mystery of why “The greenhouse gas effect (GHGE)” does not exist,
one certainly has to have an understanding of quantum physics and the
basic laws of conservation of energy. To most people, including many
scientists, quantum physics is a mystery especially because many
things that occur are not intuitive. When explained and proven by
experiments, it can be understood. As with any mystery; what are the
real clues and what are the red herrings?
It is desirable that anyone that can
read be able to understand the experiment documented herein and what
it means. This paper is for everyone – from the man on the street
who would suffer the most by government “1984 Big Brother”
control to the Ph. D. holders in social sciences, finance and
otherwise unrelated branches of science, law and politics.
At the outset, having communicated with
real people and some Ph. D’s, I realized that my mission appeared
to be a veritable “Mission Impossible”. Being able to read does
not mean that the reader can comprehend the inner workings of
science. While having a Ph. D. in one field does not give someone
sound knowledge or judgment in unrelated fields (although many are
increasingly taking the time to study in other areas to accumulate
the knowledge needed). Each person may possess an area of expertise
but only a few can extend this knowledge to analyze clues within
totally unfamiliar mysteries.
We need to start with a very brief
definition of the greenhouse gas effect (GHGE) – an effect where
certain gases have the molecular composition to absorb Infrared
(heat) radiation – and what happens afterward is important because it
is not intuitive but is proven by basic physics. The Bohr model shows
this millions of times each day by our use of Infrared heaters in
homes, restaurants (food warmers), factories, bus stops, etc. This
process of absorbing Infrared radiation (IR) is supposed to cause the
earth to be warmer than a planet without carbon dioxide (CO2), or any
other atmosphere. Yet here is just one example of a recent paper that
gives us insight into the real causes of “climate change”:_
hyperlink
“http://notrickszone.com/2011/12/30/the-suns-impact-on-earths-temperature-goes-far-beyond-tsi-new-paper-shows/”__The
Sun’s Impact On Earth’s Temperature Goes Far Beyond TSI – New
Paper Shows_
By _ HYPERLINK
“http://notrickszone.com/author/admin/”__P
Gosselin_ on 30th
December 2011 (TSI=total solar irradiance)
There are several words or terms used in
this paper that need some explanation; a Glossary of terms is
provided within the Appendix.