“The Capitalists, they made it [socialism] a dirty word”
“Respect Mother Earth”
“We like to tell our students that the majority of scientist, all of them in fact, do agree”
“Buddhism, Zen Buddhism, concerns itself with beings, all beings, not just human beings, all beings, and we concern ourselves with the suffering of all beings”
“Spirituality is connected to the Earth”
“The polar bear bears a disproportionate burden…”
They have no respect for “Mother Earth”. They left their trash everywhere for others to clean up. If they were respectful there would have been no trace that they were even there.
My own mother was human. So far as I know, the only thing “mother earth” is capable of reproducing “herself” would be in the form of dirt balls and dirt bags.
Thats right JeRK – bags of crap like you.
She loves all things equally.
Between you and me, you’re the insulting little twerp who can’t speak civilly to another human being. Where did you learn that kind of talk? Your mommy talk that way to your daddy?
LOL
How can you spot a liberal idiot in less than 60 seconds? The first thing out of their mouths is name calling and the second thing out of their mouths is a personal insult and every thing out of their mouths is just gas heated up by frustrated emotions. Some people just never grow up. They get bigger, but instead of becoming adults, they’re just great big itty bitty kids.
Which of his daddy’s did his mama talk to?
I have been a conservationist all my life. The old rag and bone man was self employed, no drain on our taxes and he made his living collecting salvageable materials to be reused. The European Union has put him out of business along with reusing glass bottles and jam jars. Now we pay taxes for recycling, second hand car bits are heavily regulated and I pay a green tax for every ton of quarry scrapings for my roadway. Greenies are a wast of resources and our taxes with their Carbon taxes and social interference.
exactly Brin…..all for a debate.. as their science is wrong!
There is no climate change only weather changes.
They have no respect for logic or science. To say “all” scientists agree is a complete fabrication. Hell, the guy who started the Weather Channel (with more weather/climate experience than most of these so-called scientists) says it’s about politics and not climate.
The first requirement to being a liberal is to have a mind open only to moronic postulations and the second requirement is to be able to lie to any one, including yourself, with a straight face and a feeling of superiority over people who can’t.
Worhsippers of Baal???
Cue Twilight Zone music…
Cue the cherry picked interviews.
cshorey, then you state it better…
I would state that action is advisable as multiple lines of evidence indicate serious economic distress if we don’t act. We also know it is easier to affect the problem early before the inertia gets going. If we wait until even the majority of posters on this site can believe what their scientists are telling them, then we will have worse economic problems and more government intervention through adaptation measures. As a conservative I prefer to chose my own path, avoid wasteful spending, and avoid a big government telling me what to do. And none of this will matter to Jorge because he missed the point that quote ripping through cherry picked interviews is not a valid argument for anything. By nature it is logically flawed from the start. Why defend it?
If there is a problem, which there is not.
That’s an opinion in direct opposition to the best evidence. I wouldn’t buy land on the shore.
cshorey, I will agree with most of what you say, but don’t that they were necessarily cherry picked. Most of these people are a bunch of idiots whom are being used by the left to control us and tax us. Unfortunatly, this movement is being directed by Communists… I have all the confidence that the free markets can and will handle any “economic distress” better than the loons now trying to control this problem.
There are plenty of bad ideas to go around in every political camp. Good reason to be on the alert to our own misconceptions. I agree that when listening to the quotes in this piece I want to sit these people down and give them a lesson in why it might be realistically worth it to do something to slow the rate of change. But if there were a reasoned response given, I’m pretty sure it ended up on the cutting room floor, to use a video anachronism. It is practically impossible to find a group of people that large where every single one of them is going to come off so lame. The law of probability and regression to the mean say this piece is almost certainly cherry picked.