What happens when – in the name of combating climate change – gigantic, industrial-sized renewable energy projects are thrust upon unsuspecting rural communities whose residents soon find out that these unsightly monstrosities destroy vegetation and wildlife, pollute rivers, streams and groundwater, and lead to higher electricity prices for families and businesses, as well as lower property values for nearby residents?

Local residents fight back, that’s what.

Spotsylvania County, Virginia lies about halfway between Washington, DC and Richmond. Although the county, located along the busy I-95 corridor, has seen its population grow fourfold since 1980, to about 135,000, its over 400 square miles are still home to picturesque woods, lakes, rivers, streams, Civil War battlefields, and productive farmland.

It is in this world that Utah-based Sustainable Power Group, also known as sPower, wants to construct the largest solar complex east of the Mississippi River and the fifth-largest solar facility in the nation. The other four mega-solar projects are located in the sparsely populated desert Southwest. How gargantuan will Spotsylvania’s facility be? SPower plans to install nearly 2 million solar panels on 3,500 acres of land, or about 5 ½ square miles. All told, the project will encompass 6,350 acres, with some 2,000 set aside for preservation.

How “Green” is the Project?

Thousands of acres of trees have already been cleared to make way for the solar arrays. Like industrial-size wind installations, solar arrays are both land-intensive and intermittent. The Spotsylvania project will require a source of backup energy when the sun doesn’t shine. But battery backup brings its own environmental problems. Batteries degrade over time, and the maintenance and eventual disposal of the thousands of batteries, all laden with toxic chemicals, needed to back up the project’s 1.8 million solar panels raises questions about how “green” the project really is.

Local residents, who have united to form Concerned Citizens of Spotsylvania, are worried about such things as erosion, water usage at the site, toxic materials in the solar panels and the backup batteries, the potential for fires, and how to handle decommission of equipment in the event the project is cancelled. These citizens turned activists, who do not want to see their communities sacrificed on the alter of someone else’s notion of “clean energy,” are pressing county officials to reject the project.

Serving Outside Interests

Little, if any, of the electricity generated at the complex would go to local residents; instead, purchasing the power would be the likes of Apple, Microsoft, Akamai, Etsy, and the University of Richmond. Deep-pocketed tech giants are not just interested in virtue-signaling their solemn commitment to “clean” energy. Many of them have electricity-hungry data centers in nearby Ashburn, Va., the nation’s leading location for data centers serving the Internet. That sPower’s Spotsylvania installation would wreak havoc on local communities and the environment is of little concern to well-connected out-of-state interests.

The 500-megawatt project was approved by Virginia’s State Corporation Commission last August but must still clear addition hurdles, including receiving special use permits from the Spotsylvania County Board of Supervisors. SPower hopes to have the facility up and running by mid-2020.

While sPower, the tech companies that would buy the electricity, and the facility’s supporters say the county will benefit from the giant solar power plant, others argue that county tax revenues will actually decline if the project goes forward. Real estate agents in the area are warning that property values could fall from 5 to 20%.

If the tech companies want power for their data centers, there is plenty available at affordable rates. Most electricity in Virginia now comes from natural gas, a baseline fuel source that is reliable, affordable, and not nearly as environmentally and aesthetically disruptive as the proposed solar project.


  • Bonner Cohen, Ph. D.

    Bonner R. Cohen, Ph. D., is a senior policy analyst with CFACT, where he focuses on natural resources, energy, property rights, and geopolitical developments. Articles by Dr. Cohen have appeared in The Wall Street Journal, Forbes, Investor’s Busines Daily, The New York Post, The Washington Examiner, The Washington Times, The Hill, The Epoch Times, The Philadelphia Inquirer, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, The Miami Herald, and dozens of other newspapers around the country. He has been interviewed on Fox News, Fox Business Network, CNN, NBC News, NPR, BBC, BBC Worldwide Television, N24 (German-language news network), and scores of radio stations in the U.S. and Canada. He has testified before the U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, the U.S. Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, the U.S. House Judiciary Committee, and the U.S. House Natural Resources Committee. Dr. Cohen has addressed conferences in the United States, United Kingdom, Germany, and Bangladesh. He has a B.A. from the University of Georgia and a Ph. D. – summa cum laude – from the University of Munich.