I want to sum up a lot of what I have been showing anyone who would look with an open mind or open heart.
The narrative that CO2 “traps heat” is a “how many angels can you stick on the head of a needle argument.” The fact is a step-up in Global temps is linked directly to Sea Surface Temperature (SST) increase and, in the past Super Ninos, which points the finger directly at water vapor (WV). This should be common sense. But it brings us to CO2’s role in re-radiating outgoing Long Wave (LW) radiation. If there is more WV, then obviously, there is more effect. But the water vapor rise IS NOT INITIATED BY CO2 BACK RADIATION. It is backed by increased evaporation off a warming ocean. So then we must ask, IS CO2 WARMING THE OCEAN, since it is the source of water vapor? ABSENT ALL OTHER FACTORS, CO2 WOULD BE THE DRIVER. So the key is, are there other factors? We find Geothermal spreading linked DIRECTLY to increased SST in the last 30 years, and what’s more, it preceded it, not followed.
You have seen this a kajillion times. Here is a kajillion and one. From Dr. Arthur Viterito:
.png)
.png)
We also find a collapse of the normal Vertical Velocity (VV) ( patterns over the tropics, allowing more sun and so more outgoing longwave radiation ( blue) and another source of oceanic warming. Both ACT ON CO2, FORCING A REACTION. But the bands are already saturated and doing whatever they are capable of doing and likely have been since before all these other factors I am showing you started. Yet, as you will see below, the first big step up in air temperature did not occur til the 97 Super Nino, pointing the finger at WV, not CO2.
But if you are unaware of geothermal, or you are aware of it and decide you will “Hunter biden laptop” by denying it, saying it is disinformation, or whatever, you leave the only reason for you to believe it’s warming is CO2. And there is the key to their argument. Dismiss or ignore obvious natural inputs that have developed last 35 years. Look at the SST. While CO2 was rising rapidly from the ’50s on, the SST had virtually no change. Why does it jump after that when the geothermal spreading starts?
1951 to 1960
1981-1990. One could argue the oceans cooled.
But then what happened once geothermal spreading started?
2013-2022
Look also at actual air temperatures surging after the Super Nino in the ’90s, while having been in a steady state before then a step up, with a further one in 15-16. If you look at saturation mixing ratios, you understand that the input leads to more warming in cold, dry areas.
But this, in turn, is factored into the entire global temp, and so we have the rise. So it is the oceans. Distorted warming, in colder, drier areas, disturbs Vertical Velocity patterns leading to the breakdown of the Hadley cell’s Upward motion and LESS CLOUDINESS. MORE SOLAR, MORE Outgoing Long-wave Radiation (OLR) in the tropics. So you would have to believe the back radiation of CO2, which can only penetrate a MM or 2 of the ocean surface, is causing all this. The air is reacting to the ocean. If you want to push CO2, you hide what I am showing you. The rise in CO2 began well before the geothermal and solar considerations I am showing you. Yet you see, there was NO CHANGE in SST and in the air, until the super nino, which screamed its water vapor went off. So what has changed? The geothermal and solar aspects. That is nature, not man.
So to all: Exactly how do you explain the SST vs Geothermal, and then the increased solar due to the resultant distortion? You have input from below ( geothermal) (and above — solar) of large natural drivers. Do you disregard Le Cheteliers, which says any CO2 effect should diminish since it has been the longer player on the field since the 1950s? What’s more, if you now are aware of this, does it not at least raise your curiosity since the introduction of those two features has largely been either dismissed or, even worse, simply hidden so you are fed a steady diet of “it’s warm, CO2 is rising”, that has to be the cause?
Am I right? Well, I am right to ask the questions, and I am right to ask other people involved to at least look. As I have said all along, I may not have the answer, but I do have questions. Saying, you have the answer, so no one else needs to apply should raise red flags. And weaponizing weather for your purpose speaks clearly as to intent.
Every day the weather demands an answer to a question, and I attempt to answer it with the forecast. This is no different for me. There is this question, and it’s ‘need to know if I am going to be the forecaster God made me to be. What is strange is what it has become. Basically, the center point of a fundamental change in the foundational values not only of the nation but how science is actually approached. That we have two major natural drivers that were introduced when SST took off and ignored, while the accused man-made feature had been at work for 40 years makes clear what Klaus Schwab’s daughter has said and is the true intent of all this: “Permanent Climate Lockdowns Coming — Whether You Like it or Not”.
And as I said in my book in 2 chapters on Covid, it’s a warm-up for all this.