President Biden's two day virtual "climate leader's summit" kicked off on Earth Day. The alarming claims made bear little resemblance to reality. The "solutions" proposed would in the main cause massive economic pain and expense for little or no environmental benefit. In some cases they would cause more environmental harm than benefit.
What's really going on in the Pacific?
Can environmentalism fill the void?
Michael Crichton: “I regard consensus science as an extremely pernicious development that ought to be stopped cold in its tracks. Historically the claim of consensus has been the first refuge of scoundrels...”
UN scientists suggested that 8.7 million species existed based on a single paper written by one of their committee members, Dr. Andy Purvis. That is over 7 million species with no physical record whatever.
Readers at cfact.org buy little of the daily climate scaremongering, but we all know friends who do.
The co-founder of Greenpeace reveals the false narratives pushed by today's Green pressure groups.
Climate modelers ignore a heat source tens of miles below us while only considering the source millions of miles above.
Factoring nature back in.
Global warming campaigners attribute too much to CO2 emissions and not enough to nature.
"All wind and solar power on an electric grid must be backed up with an equal or greater amount of fossil fuel power running on standby 100% of the time in order to maintain grid equilibrium when the wind does not blow or the sun does not shine.”
They know full well that ALL ENERGY WOULD HAVE TO BE RATIONED BY GOVERNMENT. That is exactly what they want.
Activists grossly distort the human impact on sea level.
We are faced with threats to the grid we haven’t seen before.
Replacing fossil fuel based electric generation with wind and solar power generation would require massive amounts of land and the destruction of natural habitats in return for less energy efficiency.