No CO2 caused global warming over the entire satellite temperature record?
University of Alabama-Huntsville climate scientists John Christy and Richard McNider found that by removing the climate effects of volcanic eruptions early on in the satellite temperature record showed virtually no change in the rate of warming since the early 1990s.
Satellite observations continue to reveal the climate computer model epic fail. Can climate science be both settled and wrong at the same time?
Dr. John Christy went to great lengths in a Tuesday congressional hearing to detail why satellite-derived temperatures are much more reliable indicators of warming than surface thermometers.
NASA and NOAA's "hottest ever" temperature pronouncements rely on thermometers, but ignore the other two primary ways of measuring global air temperatures, satellites and radiosondes (weather balloons).
Climate models used by scientists to predict how much human activities will warm the planet have been over-predicting global warming for the last six decades, according to a recent working paper by climate scientists.
There's an increasing body of evidence which suggests climate researchers are "adjusting" terrestrial temperature data to cool the past and warm the present.
Go ahead, examine the data for yourself. Compare it to the computer model projections. That's what the warming crowd fears most.