How to talk to a climate alarmist

By |2017-05-01T13:30:38+00:00April 29th, 2017|Climate|6 Comments

Global warming hype and hysteria have for some time dominated the news media, academia, schools, and institutions like the UN and the U.S. government. Many of the arguments put forth by global warming advocates either embellish or distort the true facts on a host of issues, ranging from rising sea levels and record temperatures to melting polar caps and polar bears, among others. This talking points memo is designed to arm people with the latest information on some important facts so they can better engage in climate change debate with those advocating the UN/Al Gore position.

Download your point by point guide on how to leave a climate alarmist stuttering with solid facts here.

6 Comments

  1. MarcJ May 1, 2017 at 1:10 PM

    In 1988, then-Sen. Timothy Wirth, D-Colo., said: “We’ve got to … try to ride the global warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong … we will be doing the right thing anyway in terms of economic policy and environmental policy.”

    To resume this far-left comedy in 3 acts performed by those US-government-paid ($25 billion per year) drones supervised by the UN socialist panel:

    1) New Ice Age in the 1970’s; remedy = our unilateral disarmament plus nationalize
    everything and establish a United Nations-supervised world socialist government
    “to spread the wealth around”, as proclaimed in 2009 by our Marxist Muslim
    ex-President from Kenya B. Hussein Obama;

    2) Global Warming scam in the 1990’s; remedy still the same. After 21 consecutive years of global COOLING the same bunch of criminals declared

    3) Climate Change hoax; remedy – see above.

    Nuclear electricity has been
    murdered by our Eco-Nazi under the Carter Administration, in spite of the fact
    that that this form of electricity generation has been by far the safest and
    environmentally the most benign method. It is my fervent hope that these
    “Climate” criminals will be arrested and sent soon to the International Court
    for Crimes Against Humanity in The Hague.

    • Mitchell May 4, 2017 at 7:57 AM

      “Nuclear electricity ………has been by far the safest and environmentally the most benign method”

      Tell that to the people in Fukushima, Japan, with the nuclear reactors that keeps on giving with no end in sight.

      • MarcJ May 5, 2017 at 4:58 AM

        Fukushima disaster was a typhoon one, nor a nuclear one; so far number of radiation victims = ZERO.

        • Mitchell May 5, 2017 at 11:11 PM

          A typhoon, where have you been living for almost 6 years Pluto?

          Following a major earthquake, a 15-metre tsunami disabled the power supply and cooling of three Fukushima Daiichi reactors, causing a nuclear accident on 11 March 2011. All three cores largely melted in the first three days.
          http://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/safety-and-security/safety-of-plants/fukushima-accident.aspx

          (Now from a report 3 years ago):
          The report compiled by prefectural authorities and local police found that the deaths of 1,656 people in Fukushima Prefecture fall into the former category. That figure surpasses the 1,607 people who died from disaster-related injuries. Another 434 people have died since 3/11 in Iwate Prefecture and 879 in Miyagi Prefecture. These indirect causes are just as deadly as the direct causes, and are likely to last much longer unless the central government takes action.
          http://www.japantimes.co.jp/opinion/2014/03/01/editorials/fukushimas-appalling-death-toll/#.WQ0-Hl5_b8s

          • MarcJ May 6, 2017 at 2:12 PM

            Sorry for my mistake – it was a tsunami wall of water and not typhoon. That does not change the rest of my missive – zero radiation deaths!

Comments are closed.