A new analysis of National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) data published Friday shows 1936 had more days above 100 degrees Fahrenheit than any other year. Recent years don’t come close.
Source: HumanProgress.org
The chart was made using NOAA data from 982 stations aggregated
by Dr. John R. Christy, a professor of atmospheric science and director of the earth system science center at the University of Alabama in Huntsville.
Since virtually the beginning of 2015, federal agencies like NOAA and NASA were predicting the year would be the warmest on record due to a naturally occuring El Nino’s, which heat the Pacific Ocean up.
Claims 2015 is the warmest year on record ignore satellite data, which shows 2015 only ranks as the third-warmest year on record.
Send tips to [email protected]
This article originally appeared in The Daily Caller
That must be why I feel the cold, I was born in the hottest time, June 1936. Looking at the peaks since 1936 to 2000 I see a decline in the annual number of hot days suggesting its getting colder, I would like to have seen it projected another 14 years.
You were duped. Not surprising at all.
Best,
D
Your assertion, You never did explain the CO2 mechanism, so obviously what you are unable to explain is beyond your pay grade. Shame!
You are making it up. Already explained it to you. Not my fault your capabilities lacking.
Best,
D
Never your fault or responsibility is it? Explain the CO2 Mechanism for late comers. Why miss out on an opportunity ?
You lack capacity to grasp that I already explained it to you, by using small words and typing slowly.
Best,
D
Click on the source sited in the second line of the article. It will give you the full plot that got truncated in printing. It is a plot of data not a projection and it simply shows the preponderance of hot days in the record to date were in the early 20th century. It implies that the recent high temperature years are the result of increased minimum temperatures.
I for one do not fear slightly warmer nights or winters.
Thanks I just copied it for reference.
Is the author trying to look
silly?
Do i even have to point out to
readers the unmentioned cherrypick?
Not even mentioned on the chart!!!
Hows that for deceit.
Admit it whatyername?
Andrew Follet. Ya not giving ALL
the RELEVANT detail are ya.