UN’s “Green Climate Fund” is wasting U.S. tax dollars
Former UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon is in the news complaining about U.S. President Donald Trump not sending more U.S. taxpayer dollars to the UN Green Climate Fund.
If you didn't find what you were looking for, try a new search!
Former UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon is in the news complaining about U.S. President Donald Trump not sending more U.S. taxpayer dollars to the UN Green Climate Fund.
The Green Climate Fund is just one of many reasons why President Trump should honor his campaign promise and withdraw the U.S. from the UN's Paris climate agreement.
Climate funding is a major sticking point at the UN climate talks in Paris. An Obama Administration official would not rule out shutting down the government over the UN "Green Climate Fund." If climate funding is not made part of a binding treaty, future U.S. Administrations will be free to cut off the funds at any time.
Front and center at the UN climate talks in Doha, Qatar will be the "Green Climate Fund," designed to transfer over a trillion dollars from the developed to the developing world. The world should abolish the Green Climate Fund now before this infant grows into the monster it is destined to become.
Those who slander others misrepresent the views of most skeptics, which center on over-attribution and humanity’s role compared to a mighty, majestic system that has always held control.
"What scientists actually agree on is very little." Watch Now.
Thousands of wind turbines and millions of solar panels generated a massive blackout.
What is the opportunity cost of climate spending?
CFACT to the big bank: "Your Energy Supply Financing Ratio claims you fund $1.29 in green energy for every $1 in high-carbon projects. Why are you prioritizing that ratio instead of funding based on ROI, energy reliability, or client demand?"
Last month the President issued an executive order titled, “Protecting American Energy from State Overreach.”