NO to the UN global climate tax!
What do you think the UN would do with a multi-billion-dollar climate slush fund?
What do you think the UN would do with a multi-billion-dollar climate slush fund?
CFACT joined a coalition letter sent to three top officials urging the Trump Administration not to send a government delegation to COP 30, the UN climate conference in Brazil this November.
Anyone looking to build their business or apply for a job should not be constrained by some government bureaucrat's notion of where and when they should travel.
The DOT made the right call in ending these wind turbine subsidies and redirecting the money to where it’s really needed.
CFACT resolves to honor Charlie Kirk's memory by doubling and tripling our work to speak up without fear wherever freedom needs defending.
Neither the United States, nor any nation, should permit the UN climate regime to dictate its energy policy via international litigation.
Energy Secretary Chris Wright has asked the public to engage with this important work and kick off a meaningful dialogue.
The Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) and the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) filed their complaint in Massachusetts District Court.
The bottom line is simple: EPA never had congressional authorization to regulate carbon dioxide and other “greenhouse” gases.
CFACT's Conservation Country report put saving Lava Ridge on the radar.
We must unfetter ourselves from ideologically driven energy restrictions.
That's how Dr. Judith Curry, a deservedly enthusiastic climate scientist, begins her blog introducing the Department of Energy's important new climate assessment.
Some great news on energy.
CFACT researched it, CFACT advocated for it, and now it's happening.
Just as people were beginning to breathe a sigh of relief, thanks to the Trump administration’s rollback of onerous climate policies, the United Nations is set to finalize a legally binding Global Plastics Treaty.