Does Google put its finger on the scale when we search?
When it comes to the climate change debate, biased mainstream media is no longer significant. Blacklisting skeptics will not work. Sorry "Nature."
The study outrageously concludes that people who correct the record on climate must be censored, but delightfully finds that CFACT is the world's number one climate communicator with Marc Morano on top!
Google appears to have three degrees of bias, each more extreme
Is amending the Constitution the only way to get spending under control? CFACT's skeptical, but the authors raise intriguing points.
Forbes didn't want you to read Professor Shaviv's work on the impact of solar activity on climate.
Google's authority based search algorithms are rigged to favor liberal content.
The closer America comes to our next national election, the stronger the pressure will be to block Americans from using social media to bypass the prevailing P.C. left-wing orthodoxy.
Apparently in defense of climate orthodoxy, the Northland Public Library of suburban Pittsburgh has banned from its shelves a best-selling book by a nationally recognized local author.
Facebook, Youtube, Google, Twitter, Wikipedia, Reddit and others who dominate the Internet and cyberspace are increasingly about censoring viewpoints with which their super-wealthy owners disagree.
Has America reached the point where our liberty can be "repressed with impunity?
Bias at internet giants is censoring speech in ways that are opaque to the speaker.
BY JOHN DROZ, Jr.: Remove some of the powers that nationally unelected political party leaders now have.
They don't want anyone correcting the record on global warming.
Social media and online publishing are today's public square. They must remain open and fair.