The way we get our news is biased. Is a fix in order?
Move over ANTIFA, the latest group of radical nihilists disrupting our daily lives in the hopes of plunging us all back into the Dark Ages is Extinction Rebellion.
Global warming campaigners want to silence those who dare correct the record on climate. When the media and governments pile on that's a blow to liberty.
Google News is wrongfully damaging its users. The product does not work.
Cost is up, quality is down and political agendas are compromising the pursuit of truth and intellectual freedom.
In Capitalism, the customer is always right; in Socialist societies, he’s always wrong.
Does academic civility still exist on campus?
What should be done about big tech bias?
We are constantly on video. How should government use that information?
Google has 10,000 humans whose job is to rate news sources.
Does Google put its finger on the scale when we search?
When it comes to the climate change debate, biased mainstream media is no longer significant. Blacklisting skeptics will not work. Sorry "Nature."
The study outrageously concludes that people who correct the record on climate must be censored, but delightfully finds that CFACT is the world's number one climate communicator with Marc Morano on top!
Google appears to have three degrees of bias, each more extreme
Is amending the Constitution the only way to get spending under control? CFACT's skeptical, but the authors raise intriguing points.