If you didn't find what you were looking for, try a new search!
AllPainNoGain.org has released a new video that features a group of expert scientists explaining how computer generated climate models that predict the climate over a very long time period are no crystal ball. Experts include: David Legates, Lord Christopher Monckton, Joseph D’Aleo, R. Anthony Lupo, John Theon, Doug Hoffman, and Allen Simmons.
Many who believe that we must act quickly to avoid major problems from man-made global warming largely base their arguments on the predictions of computer-generated models. But are these models trustworthy? Well according to a major study in the Journal of Geophysical Research, these climate models still have a number of serious problems, and may not even be improving with time. Amazingly, one portion of the study found that using more realistic simulations of the ocean actually led to worse temperature projections than when less realistic ocean data was used. It’s little wonder then that scientific debate continues to [...]
Many who believe that we must act quickly to avoid major problems from man-made global warming largely base their arguments on the predictions of computer-generated models. But are these models trustworthy? Well according to a major study in the Journal of Geophysical Research, these climate models still have a number of serious problems, and may not even be improving with time. Amazingly, one portion of the study found that using more realistic simulations of the ocean actually led to worse temperature projections than when less realistic ocean data was used. It's little wonder then that scientific debate continues to [...]
PAUL DRIESSEN (Washington) In ancient times, priestesses at the Oracle at Delphi often answered important political questions with enigmatic predictions derived from dreams, signs, casting lots or reading animal entrails. Today, in the realm of climate change, that function is served by scientific priests and priestesses who offer forecasts of dubious value, derived from computer models. […]
Many who believe that we must act quickly to avoid major problems from man-made global warming largely base their arguments on the predictions of computer-generated models. But are these models trustworthy? Well according to a major study in the Journal of Geophysical Research, these climate models still have a number of serious problems, and may not even be improving with time. Amazingly, one portion of the study found that using more realistic simulations of the ocean actually led to worse temperature projections than when less realistic ocean data was used. It's little wonder then that scientific debate continues to [...]
Many who believe that we must act quickly to avoid major problems from man-made global warming largely base their arguments on the predictions of computer-generated models. But are these models trustworthy? Well according to a major study in the Journal of Geophysical Research, these climate models still have a number of serious problems, and may not even be improving with time. Amazingly, one portion of the study found that using more realistic simulations of the ocean actually led to worse temperature projections than when less realistic ocean data was used. It’s little wonder then that scientific debate continues to [...]
Is there a difference between a “projection” and a “prediction?” Well in the field of science, specifically with reference to global warming, there’s a world of difference according to Dr. Patrick Michaels of the Cato Institute. In a column in the Washington Times, Michaels revealed that recent climate models are so fraught with errors and exaggerated assumptions, particularly with respect to temperature and precipitation, that they couldn’t even simulate 25-year temperature averages as the greenhouse effect changed over the last 100 years. Since such so-called “projections” are more like “predictions,” it’s little wonder Michaels maintains that such global warming [...]
For years, those critical of computer models suggesting a warming of the earth's temperature were ridiculed as "nay Sayers" and "flat-earthers". Global Climate Models (a.k.a. GCMs), believed many, can be relied upon with certainty to predict future global warming. Now comes new research suggesting the "nay Sayers" may not be flat-earthers, but flat-out right thinkers. The problem with the GCMs has always been their relationship to cloud cover, which tends to regulate the earth's temperature to a far greater degree than the models suggest. The new research, conducted by the American Meteorological Society, has uncovered a huge heat vent over the [...]
The rise of ChatGPT and similar large-language AI models require huge amounts of computing power which has turbocharged data-center demand.
Fear-mongering and GIGO computer models have replaced evidence-based science, history.