Promoting anthropogenic global warming

David Evans, a CFACT advisor who served as a consultant to the Australian Greenhouse Office from 1999 to 2005. Kevin Rudd has failed to see through the vested interests that promote anthropogenic global warming (AGW), the theory that human emissions of carbon cause global warming. Though masquerading as "science based", the promoters of AGW have a medieval outlook and are in fact anti-science. Meanwhile carbon is innocent, and the political class is plunging ahead with making us poorer because they do not understand what science really is or what the real science is. The Renaissance began when the absolute authority of [...]

By
|2012-10-19T17:46:09-04:00December 23rd, 2008|Comments Off on Promoting anthropogenic global warming

No smoking hot spot

Dr David Evans was a consultant to the Australian Greenhouse Office from 1999 to 2005 and is a CFACT advisor. I devoted six years to carbon accounting, building models for the Australian Greenhouse Office. I am the rocket scientist who wrote the carbon accounting model (FullCAM) that measures Australia's compliance with the Kyoto Protocol, in the land use change and forestry sector. FullCAM models carbon flows in plants, mulch, debris, soils and agricultural products, using inputs such as climate data, plant physiology and satellite data. I've been following the global warming debate closely for years. When I started that job in [...]

By
|2012-10-23T09:12:31-04:00July 22nd, 2008|Comments Off on No smoking hot spot

Sun losing its spots could mean cold climate ahead

While all the attention about climate change focuses on a warmer earth, many scientists are starting to worry about just the opposite, namely global cooling.

By
|2013-03-11T12:06:28-04:00July 11th, 2008|Comments Off on Sun losing its spots could mean cold climate ahead

Scientists’ Letter: Dear Dr. Pachauri and the IPCC

We are writing to you and others associated with the IPCC position – that man’s CO2 is a driver of global warming and climate change – to ask that you now in view of the evidence retract support from the current IPCC position [as in footnote 1] and admit that there is no observational evidence in measured data going back 22,000 years or even millions of years that CO2 levels (whether from man or nature) have driven or are driving world temperatures or climate change. […]

By
|2012-10-23T09:12:32-04:00April 14th, 2008|Comments Off on Scientists’ Letter: Dear Dr. Pachauri and the IPCC

What about the Poles?

"The relentless grip of the Arctic Ocean that defied man for centuries is melting away," warned Doug Struck in the Washington Post. "The sea ice reaches only half as far as it did 50 years ago. In the summer of 2006, it shrank to a record low. This summer, the ice pulled back even more, by an area nearly the size of Alaska." NASA's James Hansen keeps claiming that CO2 is "pushing the climate past its tipping point." British banks are sending "volunteers" to the Arctic to see for themselves the loss of sea ice, and to view the "endangered" polar [...]

By
|2012-10-19T17:52:36-04:00December 5th, 2007|Comments Off on What about the Poles?

Climate Change Models Aren’t Much Better Than Oracles

PAUL DRIESSEN (Washington) In ancient times, priestesses at the Oracle at Delphi often answered important political questions with enigmatic predictions derived from dreams, signs, casting lots or reading animal entrails. Today, in the realm of climate change, that function is served by scientific priests and priestesses who offer forecasts of dubious value, derived from computer models. […]

By
|2012-10-23T09:12:32-04:00October 13th, 2005|Comments Off on Climate Change Models Aren’t Much Better Than Oracles

Revised data heats up Global Warming controversy

Is the debate now over for skeptics of global warming hysteria? Readers of USA Today may certainly have that impression. "Satellite and weather-balloon research released today removes a last bastion of scientific doubt about global warming, researchers say," reported USA Today on Aug.12. Certainly the USA Today report was partially correct – the researchers did, in fact, “say” [read “claim”] that “the last bastion of scientific doubt” had been removed. But claims and reality often don’t match up. Three papers published in the journal Science last week purport to debunk an important argument advanced by skeptics of the notion of catastrophic, [...]

By
|2012-10-19T17:52:36-04:00August 25th, 2005|Comments Off on Revised data heats up Global Warming controversy

Dr. Benny Peiser’s Letter to “Science” and Its Rejection

Review Finds Robust Climate Debate Rather Than “Consensus.” Magazine Rejects Corrections.  Read and Judge for Yourself. 1.  Dr. Peiser’s Analysis of the Oreskes Study e-letter to Science Magazine sent: 4 January 2005 […]

By
|2012-10-23T09:12:32-04:00May 4th, 2005|Comments Off on Dr. Benny Peiser’s Letter to “Science” and Its Rejection

Dr. Roy Spencer on Day After Tomorrow

This week, a colossal summer movie about the effects of global warming called “The Day After Tomorrow” opens in theaters.  But according to scientist Dr. Roy Spencer of the University of Alabama at Huntsville, moviegoers need to remember that this epic is pure entertainment. Comments Dr. Spencer:  “‘The Day After Tomorrow’ is an example of how science can get hurt when it's mixed with pop culture. The climate change scenario in this movie is science fiction, and it shouldn't be confused with a climate forecast. Almost all research indicates a slow and gradual change in climate, probably not even [...]

By
|2012-10-19T17:46:11-04:00May 24th, 2004|Comments Off on Dr. Roy Spencer on Day After Tomorrow

Dr. Fred Singer on Russia and Kyoto

http://www.cfact.org/site/radio/volume133/Track02.ram

By
|2012-10-19T17:52:36-04:00November 4th, 2003|Comments Off on Dr. Fred Singer on Russia and Kyoto
Go to Top