Tom Steyer’s “clean energy” campaign submitted numerous fraudulent signatures to qualify for AZ ballot

Not long after campaign supporters submitted their signatures and celebrated, opponents of the measure found numerous errors, inconsistencies, and what appears to be full-blown fraud.

By
|2018-07-11T20:09:54-04:00July 12th, 2018|Comments Off on Tom Steyer’s “clean energy” campaign submitted numerous fraudulent signatures to qualify for AZ ballot

SolarCity to pay nearly $30 million fine for allegedly lying to gov’t agents

SolarCity, a subdivision of electric vehicle maker Tesla, agreed to pay $29.5 million to resolve allegations the company submitted inflated claims to cash in on a solar stimulus program.

By
|2017-09-25T11:14:21-04:00September 25th, 2017|2 Comments

Hillary’s energy policies

Hillary will ensure her supporter's green energy investments pay off by demanding that America go green.

By
|2016-08-02T10:09:08-04:00July 26th, 2016|7 Comments

The Hillary treatment for climate fraudsters?

Maybe Eric Schneiderman and his fellow AGs are onto something -- they are just investigating the wrong side. Instead of criminalizing differences of opinion or inconvenient facts, we might do well to root out actual fraud, let real science prevail, and protect our livelihoods and living standards from unscrupulous people and organizations that are using fraudulent climate chaos claims to control energy use, transform the U.S. and global economic systems, and redistribute the world’s wealth.

By
|2016-07-18T15:43:00-04:00July 18th, 2016|3 Comments

Gore, Attorneys General target fossil fuel companies for “fraud”

Al Gore and a small number of attorneys general gathered at a press conference Tuesday to bemoan what they see as the “fraud” and unlawful actions perpetrated by fossil fuel companies. The witch hunt is on.

By
,
|2020-08-13T10:16:36-04:00March 30th, 2016|31 Comments

More fraudulent science from EPA

The EPA is at it again -- using fraudulent science to justify lowering automotive sulfur content from 30 ppm to 10 ppm -- after already reducing the sulfur allowable from 300 to 30 ppm just since 2004. EPA makes the bold, fraudulent claim that the rules will cost consumers less than a penny a gallon. Meanwhile, EPA has doled out $181 million to 15 of its Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee members in grants since 2000, which hardly makes them independent. CFACT's Paul Driessen makes a strong case for ending million-dollar payoffs to advisory groups and much more effective legislative and judiciary oversight of unaccountable government agenices like the EPA.

By
|2014-03-31T14:58:18-04:00March 31st, 2014|Comments Off on More fraudulent science from EPA
Go to Top