military

U.S. military exits climate change after wasteful decade

So begins a new age of realistic military policy and an end to more than 15 years of wasteful climate change spending.

By Steve Goreham |2025-04-03T22:24:53-04:00April 3rd, 2025|Comments Off

Turbine trouble

It is expensive, heavily subsidized (a hidden tax), unreliable, causes negative health impacts, kills large birds of prey and bats and can be maddening to people who live nearby. They're bad for the military too.

By CFACT Ed, Mark Mathis |2019-06-13T14:44:52-04:00June 17th, 2019|Comments Off

Climate security confusion abounds

Hypothetical vulnerability analyses are in no sense realistic threat assessments.

By CFACT Ed, David Wojick |2019-06-10T22:38:09-04:00June 12th, 2019|Comments Off

Global warming agenda puts national security at risk?

Any assertion that global warming is putting our national security at risk is ill-informed and contradicted by clear scientific evidence.

By CFACT |2018-08-21T22:05:02-04:00August 21st, 2018|Comments Off

Obama battle cry: “Remember the climate!”

President Obama has issued an executive order directing the Department of Defense (and all other federal government agencies) to make preparing for global warming impacts a top priority, and treat climate change as our most serious national security threat.

By Paul Driessen |2016-02-22T17:14:21-05:00February 22nd, 2016|105 Comments