Frightening children with doomsday scenarios is just plain wrong, but that is exactly what the environmental extremists are doing in public school classrooms. Children are being taught that carbon dioxide, that is emitted when fossil fuels are burned, causes climate change. Extremists ignore the fact that the uncontrollable sun, winds and ocean currents are the primary causes of climate change. They also ignore satellite data that the earth has not warmed since 1998.
Nonetheless, environmental extremists are using every means possible to convince children that unless wealthy countries transfer their wealth to third world nations, they are responsible for killing polar bears, ousting poor people from their homes, starving little children, and causing climate catastrophes that will ultimately destroy the earth.
At the ongoing United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change in Marrakech, Moroccan King Mohammed VI said, “[I]t has become necessary to unify education on environmental issues, and raise awareness about its defining role in preserving the future of mankind.” Environmental extremists take this to mean that every nation’s education system must frighten children about environmental extremism.
Ted Turner’s foundation is pushing this scary scenario through its children’s cartoon series, “Captain Planet,” that presents Gaia as the “spirit of the earth,” who grants powers to persons over fire, wind, water, heart and telepathy.
The Gates’ foundation is pushing the same reckless agenda of human-caused “climate change” through Obama’s radical left, one-size-fits-all curriculum called Common Core.
The environmental extremist agenda is frightening children into submission in hopes they will become useful to the underlying Marxist agenda to redistribute wealth from “rich” to “poor’ nations. The ruse is that if burning fossil fuels causes climate change, then Americans owe it to the “poor” nations to fund their infrastructure to adapt to severe weather. It is the watermelon Marxist agenda, green on the outside and red on the inside.
We can hope that President-elect Donald Trump will get the federal government’s Common Core curriculum out of America’s classrooms. And that he will appoint representatives who will speak boldly for sound science at the UN.
The Clinton Foundation received millions from this scumbag “king” in exchange for shutting down a huge phosphate mine in central Florida so that prices would shoot up. Because Morocco has a huge phosphate mine! On land they stole! Fortunately Hillary’s scummy friend at the EPA failed.
The only way the AGW crowd can get converts is to say that CO2 is going to destroy the planet. Every person that comes here spouting the AGW mantra believes just that, humans are destroying the planet by emitting CO2. What a joke.
“Children are being taught that carbon dioxide, that is emitted when fossil fuels are burned, causes climate change”.
A better headline to this story is “Cathie Adams should stop intentionally misinforming the public with unscientific rubbish statements”. Cathie, please start by educating yourself before giving advice on the school curriculum: http://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/
Ian why not educate us with a viable explanation as to how CO2 causes global warming, this also needs quantifying otherwise its pretty useless. Try to lay off one theory being required to explain another. Unadjusted facts please.
The “viable explanation” of the greenhouse is basic physics, Try starting with this basic Kid’s Britannica video.
http://kids.britannica.com/comptons/art-149342/The-greenhouse-effect-is-a-natural-phenomenon-through-which-Earth?&articleTypeId=31
If it is why do you keep spouting the green lies?
Let’s hear something specific. That is a serious accusation. Tell us what lies that I am apparently spouting. And provide some evidence don’t just make something up.
Your ducking and weaving, your references to pro warmest sites instead of explanations adds up to deception.
The fact remains that mans CO2 contribution is next to nothing, a tiny percentage of a minor gas. In support you use theoretical particle physics, computer models which have no resemblance to reality. In order to make the data compatible from satellites there seems to be much adjustment and its always in the most advantageous direction.
Show us a viable explanation of exactly how CO2 causes warming. A flawed theory that requires another theory is one too far. Your get an education smear is burnt out.
One wonders what this troll thinks he is achieving by coming here trolling. Responding to his garbage is a waste of time. On top of that, he isn’t too bright.
As the troll admits, his understanding is that of a kids video. He can’t explain how CO2 drives climate change but then again, no one else can either.