The California offshore wind environmental impact statement is full of holes
It studiously specifically avoids those issues that lead one to conclude that building these turbines is a bad idea.
It studiously specifically avoids those issues that lead one to conclude that building these turbines is a bad idea.
The fiasco started when the developing countries demanded huge impossibly sums centered on $1.3 trillion.
The amount of our money the UN wants is staggering.
UN Climate COPs have always been about big money but until now there was a facade of emission reductions to hide it behind.
What happens when you ask the bots directly?
A large number of grid scale battery complexes are presently proposed for Washington State and the scale of the threat is correspondingly enormous.
Washington State electricity users are in the complete dark about the oncoming avalanche of what is bound to be expensive power.
A fundamental change in K-12 science education has created a huge opportunity for large language models.
The supposed benefits of a series of wind farms are not just exaggerated; they are fabricated.
Construction of huge battery arrays with no concern for potentially catastrophic fires is out of control.
How much economic and environmental damage is in store?
Could issue analysis be be the next big thing in AI?
California has adopted a target of 25,000 MW of floating offshore wind generation capacity.
The Green New Deal is impossibly expensive.
Watching this two hundred billion dollar floater game unfold will be very interesting indeed.