Junk science and scare stories stampede countries into taking drastic, counterproductive action
It attempted to blame the coronavirus crisis on human activities that The Guardian and its writers tend to detest, even though they are essential for modern civilization and didn't cause the virus.
The UN, environmentalist pressure groups and their financial backers have a lot to answer for.
They want to ban coal, oil and gas. Exactly how will they replace them? Who wins? Who loses?
Virginia’s “carbon-free” bills would shut down some 6,200 megawatts of coal-based electricity and ban construction of new gas-fired units.
UN and EU government agencies – and tax-exempt NGOs – have brought a plague of locusts
There is nothing ‘cohesive’ or ‘sustainable’ about ‘solutions’ demanded by WEF ‘stakeholders’
Fire, while devastating, is occurring at historically normal rates. That won't stop team warming from cashing in on other people's misery. Does it ever?
President Trump should help poor nations by directing USAID to support coal and gas, not just wind and solar
Africa must move forward without them, using fossil and nuclear energy to build prosperity.
Biofuels are unsustainable in every way, but still demand – and get – preferential treatment.
Activist junk science breeds bad policy
Replacing fossil fuels with “renewable” energy would devastate the only planet we’ve got.
The latest “renewable, sustainable” energy claims show the IEA belongs in an insane asylum.
Coercion is always a big part of climate plans.