During the Apollo program there was no room for fudged data, dodgy math, or politically correct science. It was a matter of life or death.
"Tomorrow begins an exciting new chapter for InSight: surface operations and the beginning of the instrument deployment phase."
Claims are one thing, and real-world evidence is another. Examine the facts and decide for yourself.
The US Energy Department is still running one of the top drivers of alarmist science for the United Nations.
If global warming caused less ice in West Antarctica, how did it cause more ice in Eastern Antarctica?
Global warming activists and their media allies have been pushing a narrative this week that global warming is producing a corn crisis, but record-high crop yields show the corn scare is just another example of fake news.
Many research results published in scientific journals shouldn’t be trusted.
Five and one-half decades have now passed since a young President John F. Kennedy rallied a nation behind a bold challenge to send an American to the Moon and safely back before the end of that decade. We did this, and even better — putting four of our citizens on the lunar surface and returning them by 1969, plus delivered two more into lunar orbit who returned with them. Within three more years, eight others had walked on the Moon on successful round-trip voyages, along with four more orbital companions. An invitation to write an article about the Apollo legacy for [...]
CFACT policy advisor Larry Bell lauds the first steps taken by the Trump Administration to restore NASA to its primary mission -- and encourages that the agency needs to press on with a mission to Mars.
At COP 23, at least, the propaganda spigot has been turned off.
Can the heavily politicized Goddard Institute for Space Studies be reformed?
All of this alarmist attribution stuff is junk science personified. We are seeing nothing that is outside of normal natural variability. As my father used to say, figures don't lie but liars sure can figure.
NASA is teaching global warming propaganda online. Time for reform.
Climate Central is a major operation, with a budget estimated at about $5 million a year and a listed staff of 36 people. As a non-profit it is funded lavishly by a combination of left-wing Foundations and Federal agencies, but science has left the building.
NASA once again can soar to the heights that once put the world in awe.