The End EPA Abuse Act seeks to limit EPA’s adherence to climate psychosis
Putting the bureaucrats back in their box.
Putting the bureaucrats back in their box.
Few Americans have heard of the EPA's Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System program.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is considering new regulatory actions aimed at addressing contaminants such as microplastics, pharmaceuticals, and other emerging pollutants that may find their way into America’s waterways. While protecting water quality is a critical objective, questions remain about how far federal regulators should go, what scientific evidence should drive these pivotal decisions, and how new requirements could affect rural communities that depend on affordable access to water resources. CFACT Collegians recognize that environmental stewardship and economic prosperity are not mutually exclusive. That is why CFACT Collegian and Brigham Young University–Idaho student Alex Goodman's public comment to the EPA [...]
The goal is to slash regulatory overreach and protect American infrastructure.
WATCH Craig Rucker on EPA Administrator Zeldin's clash with the congressional Left.
Administrator Lee Zeldin lays out EPA's climate and energy realist agenda. WATCH NOW
Three highly credentialed climate scientists have asked John Roberts to intervene in instructions to judges across America.
Earlier this year, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposed revisions to Section 401 of the Clean Water Act, a provision that governs how states and authorized tribes review federal permits for projects that may impact local water quality. The proposal seeks to restore a broader interpretation of state authority, allowing certifying agencies to evaluate the full scope of federally permitted activities—not just narrow point-source discharges such as pipes or ditches—and giving states greater procedural flexibility to approve, deny, or condition permits in ways that align with their own water quality standards. The proposed changes would reinforce the Clean Water Act’s original [...]
Trump, Zeldin, Wright, and crew should not just rely on legal arguments, but rather double down on the science as they take on the endangerment finding. Posterity will thank them.
The Obama EPA tortured the Clean Air Act into an outcome Congress never intended. Reform was overdue.
The Obama EPA bypassed Congress. The Courts should find that ending the endangerment finding was constitutionally mandated.
Learn more about the endangerment finding repeal and brewing Potomac River sewage crisis in the latest District of Conservation episode. Tune in!
We're nowhere near tired of all the winning! WATCH NOW
Trump Admin Eliminates Obama-Era Endangerment Finding, off-cycle credits, start-stop feature. Official EPA release
Repealing the "Endangerment Finding" is a bold and needed step to reform climate policy, protect our economy, and restore the constitutional separation of powers that keeps us free.