There can only be one center or origin, and therefore only one ground zero. Yet global warming alarmists, in their typical over-hyping of thoroughly debunked climate scares, want everyone to believe they personally live at ground zero. The more that alarmists over-hype this phrase, the less credible they become.
USAID still pushes climate alarmism over energy, jobs, health and prosperity for poor countries. First of three parts.
YouTube labeling of climate debate videos with a fact that no one disputes scientifically is pointless.
“The bottom line of the real fire data produced by the State of California and in the peer-reviewed literature is clear: there has been no upward trend in the number of wildfires in California during the past decades,” Mass wrote on his blog. “In fact, the frequency of fires has declined,” he wrote. “And in most of the state, there has not been an increasing trend in area burned during the past several decades.”
Science is the enemy of global warming alarmists. And objective scientific data is that enemy on steroids. Let’s take a look at what the scientific data reveal about summer warmth.
Skeptics of climate alarmism are surprised that President Trump has nominated atmospheric scientist Kelvin Droegemeier to head up the Office of Science and Technology Policy, and possibly be his official Science Advisor as well. The likely explanation is the looming midterm elections.
Most don’t care, don’t think it affects them much, and don’t believe the hype.
Suicides may be more frequent in the summer, but death rates in general are much higher in the winter. Somehow, USA Today and the other media outlets forgot to mention that.
The US Energy Department is still running one of the top drivers of alarmist science for the United Nations.
The inconvenient fact is that sea level has been rising at a tiny 1 to 3 millimeters per year, as it has since before the industrial revolution with no significant acceleration.
“Global warming and solutions thereto must be addressed by the two other branches of government,” Keenan wrote.
Seeking to block use of “gliders” which pair refurbished engines with new trucks.
People seem to think that adaptation to climate change is a free good. Some people tout it as a “no regrets” alternative to questionable mitigation efforts such as decarbonization. It is certainly not free and if the projected changes fail to occur it can easily be very bad.
WATCH NOW
USAID’s goal should be real development, not this kind of spooky anti-development.
When only a third of peer-reviewed studies reach the same results when they are replicated by outside authors, this is a serious problem.
Five “multilateral development banks,” along with the European Investment Bank and Islamic Development Bank, released a joint report on what they call “climate finance” – which last year jumped a whopping 30% – to a staggering $34 billion dollars! How does this impact getting energy to the poor?
Baseball, hot dogs, apple pie, and July heat are all part of the American experience, and global warming did not cause any of them.
The request for information invites us “to think boldly about the opportunities for advancing environmental research and education into its next stage through a lens focused on economic competitiveness and/or national security.”
If they can’t stop energy development, they block pipeline transport (and get unexpected help).