National Academies go preposterous on CO2
You would think the National Academy of Sciences understands science, but you would be wrong.
You would think the National Academy of Sciences understands science, but you would be wrong.
Blot out the sun in the name of climate? What could go wrong?
What could possibly go wrong?
In the key DOE report chapter I analyzed, nothing whatever was refuted, repudiated, or rebutted. There wasn't even any scientific disagreement!
Where has climate exaggeration and scaremongering led?
Hurricanes not intensifying more rapidly, Colorado River water storage not "what climate change looks like," Arctic Sea ice, Great Barrier Reef, fire ants, French fires, bananas, Detroit temperature exaggeration, and more.
NAS is a leading alarmist, so of course they disagree with the DOE climate assessment.
CFACT is confident that the Environmental Protection Agency will fully consider all these factors in its reassessment of the 2009 Endangerment Decision, as applied to mobile and stationary sources alike.
Activists keep blaming every bad weather event on ‘climate change.’
Once his rule has been finalized and has survived court challenges, the precedent will have been set for rescinding all federal rules targeting greenhouse gas emissions.
The U.S. is getting out of the UN's Paris Climate Treaty just in time.
Energy Secretary Chris Wright has asked the public to engage with this important work and kick off a meaningful dialogue.
The Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) and the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) filed their complaint in Massachusetts District Court.
It’s about time that the U.S. supports unbiased and objective climate science.
After millions of years of asteroids, volcanoes, wild temperature changes, and dramatic shifts in atmospheric gases (plus sea level swings of 125 m), it would be a shock if corals did not have a full toolkit to cope with a bit of climate change.