"Only the 'habitat' of the endangered species is eligible for designation as critical habitat." Is the ESA no longer a blank check for eco-gadflies?
The Clean Air Act has successfully ensured clean air for America. EPA would be wise not to impose further burdens at a time when the country can least afford them.
The digital era makes cities less relevant. City leaders should not push business out.
Is it too much to ask that government regulations do more good than harm?
If promulgated, future significant regulations promulgated under the Clean Air Act may be accompanied by a benefit-cost analysis.
For scientific analysis to have validity it must be transparent. Read CFACT's official comments and SUBMIT YOURS NOW.
In the midst of the fight to save lives from the COVID-19 pandemic, the Trump administration announced a regulatory change on another issue that also will save lives.
Tough times teach tough lessons. Tossing aside foolish policy is a lesson worth learning.
What is being done in the name of protecting marine mammals and sea turtles from the practices of California fishermen will ironically – and predictably – benefit foreign suppliers of swordfish, many of whom operate with nary a thought of protecting endangered marine life.
Count on at least two results from the outlawing of plastic grocery bags: increased energy use and environmental cost to produce more paper grocery bags; and increased spreading of germs from reusable tote bags at grocery stores, which is especially worrisome with coronavirus spreading.