Is the U.S. throwing money down the drain with weather and climate models?
No government has spent more money on their weather models than the U.S.
No government has spent more money on their weather models than the U.S.
The article is "The Impact of CO2, H2O and Other “Greenhouse Gases” on Equilibrium Earth Temperatures" by Coe, Fabinski and Weigleb, in the International Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences.
The MAGICC Model projects what exactly would be the impact on the temperature of the Earth if the United States, or any other political subdivision on Earth, ceased the burning of all fossil fuels now- not at some distant time in the future.
Nov 2019 will go down as yet another major bust of the climate models
The public has no clue what a mathematical model actually is, how they work or what they can and can not do.
When evaluating extremely important information do you rely on shaky data or unverified research? That’s what climate campaigners and their cheerleaders in the press and politics are asking us to do on climate.
BY TOM HARRIS & Dr. JAY LEHR: The global climate scare – and policies resulting from it – are based on models that do not work.
The NCA warns of what "might" happen, while 84% of its Key Messages are based on highly speculative modeling of worst case future scenarios.
It’s the latest in a slew of studies trying to figure out how much warming can be expected from a doubling of carbon dioxide levels. The answer: not much, according to Lewis and Curry.
This noted astrophysicist / geoscientist has lost patience with global warming dogma.
A major new study says that the cost to meet the UN Paris Agreement's target of limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees C is a whopping three times the cost to limit it to 2 degrees. That is a huge cost for a very small difference.
Something like 55% of the modeling done in all of science is done in climate change science, even though it is a tiny fraction of the whole of science.
More than 70 percent of climate models underestimated the amount of rain compared to real world observations.
Brace for a climate of hysteria.
Global warming is based on global statistics that have little credibility.