Climate delusion: Washington Post claims more plant growth is bad
Is it better or worse to have a global climate that benefits plant growth?
Is it better or worse to have a global climate that benefits plant growth?
Most plants grow 1) much faster, 2) healthier, 3) stronger, 4) use water more efficiently, 5) grow much more efficiently in higher altitudes and drier locations, 6) handle heat better, 7) handle all types of stresses better, and 8) are often more pest resistant - with more C02 in the air.
It is not likely that a carbon dioxide tax would produce any measurable change in the CO2 in the atmosphere, but it would damage the U.S. economy and enrage the citizenry.
Objective evidence shows coral have thrived under much more warming and cooling than is presently occurring, and coral continue to thrive today.
Collin’s most distorted contortion of credulity suggests that increased atmospheric CO2 levels present a plant growth liability. These shelves emptied by Venezuelan Socialism, not your appliances.
EPA's finding that carbon dioxide represents a dangerous public health and safety "pollutant" should finally be subjected to a proper "high level" peer review as required by the U.S. Information Quality Act (IQA).
The Earth's atmosphere is more complicated than global warming campaigners would have us believe.
CO2 is the gas that feeds us. We're made from it.
Newsweek tried score a cheap point about CO2 but the facts brushed them back.
What if manmade CO2 isn’t the villain deep-thinking elites say it is?
Carbon dioxide is a colorless, odorless gas, which while containing a single atom of carbon, bears no other resemblance to elemental carbon.
Carbon Dioxide levels may be higher than any time during the past 3 million years. If that is so, however, it merely shows that the Earth’s climate is not nearly as sensitive to carbon dioxide as alarmists claim.
By Collister Johnson, Jr. CO2 (the gas you just exhaled) might not be such a bad fella after all.
BY STEVE GOREHAM: Burning wood for electricity is just one more foolish policy in the “fight” against global warming.
A government-mandated transition to 100% renewable energy would completely destroy the U.S. industrial base and cause lights to go out in millions of households across the country.