Planners versus people
Planners find that “sprawl” is inefficient, thus people should be herded into more compact spaces.
Planners find that “sprawl” is inefficient, thus people should be herded into more compact spaces.
Those who support the Green New Deal (GND) want what they claim to be the only real solution to the global warming problem which is solar power, and other so-called renewables to save our planet from the ravages of fossil fuel.
Can wind power replace fossil fuels with the help of even less productive solar energy? The answer is no.
Their energy solutions won't work and cost more than any nation can afford.
And that is in the unlikely event that Bernie’s plan comes in on budget.
We are not dealing with a mere bartender here. We are dealing with a policy expert who happens to have tended bar.
Thank you, AOC for your “public service!” Her Green New Deal is nonsense, but the backfiring of her message has been a thing to behold.
Intermittent wind and solar can't keep the shelves stocked and people moving.
The home of the Alamo is considering adopting a Climate Action & Adaptation Plan (CAAP), which is the brainchild of SA Climate Ready, an organization dedicated to “building solutions to prepare our city for climate change.”
Climate change is the crisis equivalent of the terrorist attacks on 9-11, or even World War II. So says Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.
The terrifyingly naïve socialist Green New Deal (GND) proposed by Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez offers the best example I can think of why 16-year-olds shouldn’t be given the right to vote.
“The human race has only one really effective weapon and that is laughter.” ― Mark Twain
The Green New Deal was designed to "mobilize every aspect of American society on a scale not seen since World War II.” The entire Republican caucus and three Democrats voted against it. The rest courageously voted "present," including the GND's Senate co-sponsors. Does anyone know whether any Senators voted "present" after the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor?
BY CHRIS WHITE: Most Democrats vote "present" following reports suggesting the GND, which seeks to phase out fossil fuel usage within 12 years, could costs tens of trillions of dollars.
BY CHRIS WHITE: “I think we need to focus on real solutions that recognize the role fossil fuels will continue to play.”