Climate change research needs to be refocused and the climate models reconfigured, in order to correctly match observations. That is how science is supposed to work.
he standard argument takes the following form: "We can get the model to do X, using human causes, but not without them, so human causes must be the cause of X."
No CO2 caused global warming over the entire satellite temperature record?
The thrust of each video is that the climate models are wrong and we need to understand why. WATCH NOW
Can the global warming campaign keep scaring us if their predictions never come true?
Satellite observations continue to reveal the climate computer model epic fail. Can climate science be both settled and wrong at the same time?
Warming would only be as high as 1.8 degrees Celsius — less than half of what IPCC originally predicted.
Climate models used by scientists to predict how much human activities will warm the planet have been over-predicting global warming for the last six decades, according to a recent working paper by climate scientists.
Global temperatures have remained steady for almost 19 years, the United States has not been hit by a Category 3, 4 or 5 hurricane since 2005, total polar ice is increasing, not melting, and seas are rising at barely seven inches per century.
Dr. Roy Spencer shows that 96.7% of climate computer models warm faster than actual observations of world temperature.