Net zero — The pursuit of the impossible
Energy reality is devastating.
Energy reality is devastating.
Birds, bats, whales, even people pay the price.
What would it mean to the average person if there were blackouts lasting two days? What would happen if the blackouts lasted two weeks?
"No Net Zero! No Green Energy Mandates!" was the call of CFACT's activists before being jokingly escorted out by security.
Voter uncertainty about energy insecurity and fuel prices is driving people to oppose the Biden administration at the ballot box. Former EPA Chief-of-Staff Mandy Gunasekara analyzes this on the podcast today.
"All wind and solar power on an electric grid must be backed up with an equal or greater amount of fossil fuel power running on standby 100% of the time in order to maintain grid equilibrium when the wind does not blow or the sun does not shine.”
With electric grids flickering and going dark, and people returning to chopping trees to heat their homes, the foolishness of "net zero" radical climate policies is being exposed faster than even we at CFACT thought possible.
UK's new Prime Minister, Liz Truss, announced boosting domestic oil and gas and lifting the nation's 2019 fracking ban.
The wealthy countries continue to focus on subsidizing intermittent electricity from breezes and sunshine while developing countries and those not within the elite core of society, suffer from shortages and inflation.
The radical Net Zero plan is not that green and does not generate and transmit reliable, affordable energy.
Climate campaigners and wind and solar companies won't give up the fight against domestic energy production.
You can’t win a geopolitical conflict lasting years or decades with an economy powered intermittently by wind turbines and solar panels.
Donn Dears in this 102 page large print well referenced and indexed narrative, tells the reader all they will ever NEED to know about trying to eliminate CO2 emissions from life as we know it.
BY TILAK K DOSHI: To hard-bitten observers of realpolitik in international negotiations, the response might well be that “if you can believe that China will be net zero by 2060, then you can believe India will be so by 2070.”
$125 trillion price tag to “fix” climate change.