Here’s your chance to demand EPA ensure transparent, open, non-ideology-driven science.
Feel free to share your comments on scientific integrity at EPA here in the comments.
Feel free to share your comments on scientific integrity at EPA here in the comments.
Remember when you were young to check your work, you worked backwards? Passed.
Although urban areas account for less than 4% of the global land surface, they contain many of the weather stations where temperatures are collected which substantially skew the bigger record picture.
We should demand objectivity, rigor and honesty.
There is strong evidence that the PM2.5 standards cannot be justified on scientific, economic, or human health grounds;
It’s just another climate "denier" with a Nobel Prize in Physics…
Here is your chance to hear ridiculous alarmism at the highest national level.
On Tuesday, we lost another friend. CFACT's friends and readers have been treated to a brilliant weekly science update from Jay who was a first class scientist and amazing athlete.
“Our schools are failing to educate students to be prepared for undergraduate science education – while also teaching them that political conformity is the essence of science.”
Watch: Morano on OAN TV: Talks about Paul Ehrlich’s claim ‘If I’m always wrong, so is science’ claim – & the NYT seeking shorter people and racist science.
Everyone at CFACT admired Walt. Colonel Cunningham was 90.
This is about a highly nonlinear information flow that I call an issue storm, which I discovered about 40 years ago but never wrote about because I was making lots of money knowing about it.
The global warming movement has damaged scientific integrity. Can we get it back?
This technological rule of threes is seen over and over in history.
After you read this series of articles extracted from the National Association of Scholars booklet, SHIFTING SANDS, you will question EPA regulations even more.